Lawmakers tackle guest worker programs in House immigration bill
The eight-member House group is having difficulties negotiating the specifics of a guest worker program, although several of its members have said that an agreement is not far off.
May 06, 2013 at 08:56 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The Senate is attracting attention this week as it debates wide-ranging immigration legislation. Meanwhile, a bipartisan group of House lawmakers continues to formulate its own bill, but is struggling over the issue of guest worker programs.
Many businesses are in favor of such programs, which would allow companies in the tech, construction and agriculture industries, among others, to hire more overseas workers. Microsoft Corp.'s general counsel, Brad Smith, for instance, has repeatedly pushed for an increase in H1-B visas that would bring more highly skilled science, engineering and tech workers stateside to compensate for the purported dearth of qualified U.S. workers.
The eight-member House group is having difficulties negotiating the specifics of such a guest worker program, although several of its members have said that an agreement is not far off, Thomson Reuters reports. During the drafting process, the group has largely resisted input from businesses and immigrants' rights groups, instead focusing on winning approval from fellow lawmakers, member John Carter (R-TX) told Thomson Reuters.
The House and the Senate have each come up with a proposed path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. The Senate's plan calls for illegal immigrants to be eligible for permanent residency status after 10 years, and for citizenship after an additional three years. The House is seeking a five-year waiting period between green card eligibility and citizenship.
The two Congressional houses are taking different approaches to the immigration issue. The Senate is committed to presenting a comprehensive bill, while the House is following a piecemeal approach that will tackle immigration one issue at a time.
Read more InsideCounsel stories about immigration issues:
26 charged in Chinese immigration fraud
Judge upholds controversial Arizona immigration provision
State courts to decide if illegal immigrants can become lawyers
Supreme Court strikes down much of Arizona immigration law
Cheat Sheet: A quick guide to the American stalemate on immigration policy
How the immigration policy stalemate is hurting businesses and the economy
The Senate is attracting attention this week as it debates wide-ranging immigration legislation. Meanwhile, a bipartisan group of House lawmakers continues to formulate its own bill, but is struggling over the issue of guest worker programs.
Many businesses are in favor of such programs, which would allow companies in the tech, construction and agriculture industries, among others, to hire more overseas workers.
The eight-member House group is having difficulties negotiating the specifics of such a guest worker program, although several of its members have said that an agreement is not far off, Thomson Reuters reports. During the drafting process, the group has largely resisted input from businesses and immigrants' rights groups, instead focusing on winning approval from fellow lawmakers, member John Carter (R-TX) told Thomson Reuters.
The House and the Senate have each come up with a proposed path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. The Senate's plan calls for illegal immigrants to be eligible for permanent residency status after 10 years, and for citizenship after an additional three years. The House is seeking a five-year waiting period between green card eligibility and citizenship.
The two Congressional houses are taking different approaches to the immigration issue. The Senate is committed to presenting a comprehensive bill, while the House is following a piecemeal approach that will tackle immigration one issue at a time.
Read more InsideCounsel stories about immigration issues:
26 charged in Chinese immigration fraud
Judge upholds controversial Arizona immigration provision
State courts to decide if illegal immigrants can become lawyers
Supreme Court strikes down much of Arizona immigration law
Cheat Sheet: A quick guide to the American stalemate on immigration policy
How the immigration policy stalemate is hurting businesses and the economy
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCrypto Industry Eyes Legislation to Clarify Regulatory Framework
SEC Official Hints at More Restraint With Industry Bars, Less With Wells Meetings
4 minute readTrump Fires EEOC Commissioners, Kneecapping Democrat-Controlled Civil Rights Agency
Trending Stories
- 128 Firms Supporting Retired Barnes & Thornburg Litigator in Georgia Supreme Court Malpractice Case
- 2Boosting Litigation and Employee Benefits Practices, Two Am Law 100 Firms Grow in Pittsburgh
- 3EMT Qualifies as 'Health Care Provider' Under Whistleblower Act, State Appellate Court Rules
- 4Bar Report - Feb. 3
- 5Was $1.3M in 'Incentive' Payments Commission? NJ Justices Weigh Arguments
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250