SuperConference 2013: Fortune 500 GCs identify challenges and give advice
A panel of top general counsel kicked off Day Two of InsideCounsels SuperConference by providing insight and advice for aspiring and current GCs in a session entitled Top Challenges Fortune 500 General Counsel Face.
May 08, 2013 at 10:27 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
A panel of top general counsel kicked off Day Two of InsideCounsel's SuperConference by providing insight and advice for aspiring and current GCs in a session entitled “Top Challenges Fortune 500 General Counsel Face.”
One of the major challenges, panelists said, is the perception that in-house lawyers can't also be businesspeople. “I don't think it's an either/or,” said Thomas Sabatino, executive vice president, general counsel and corporate secretary of Walgreens. “I think that's a false dichotomy.”
Bridging the perceived gap between a GC's legal and business role starts with effective communication. “There's no reason to sound like a lawyer just because you are one,” said Don Liu, senior vice president, general counsel and secretary of Xerox Corp. Instead, in-house lawyers should be able to clearly explain legal concepts to colleagues outside the law department.
And it's not enough for GCs to have legal expertise; they also must have a deep knowledge of the factors driving their companies' business. “I'm amazed when a public company in-house lawyer isn't intimately familiar with their K or their Q or their profits statement, which every shareholder presumably reads pretty carefully,” Liu said.
To promote this business knowledge, Liu regularly meets with his legal team to discuss each quarterly earnings report and the strengths and weaknesses that it reflects, as does fellow panelist Jeffrey Carr, senior vice president, general counsel and secretary of FMC Technologies Inc.
Legal teams at nonpublic companies may not have the benefit of regular earnings reports, but they should still seek out key business metrics such as internal and external costs, and legal spend as a percentage of revenue.
Of course, GCs can't run their legal departments alone. Building a top-flight legal team, the panelists said, is less about hiring candidates with perfect law school pedigrees or a list of big-name employers on their resumes. “I think technical skills are overrated,” Liu said. “EQ [emotional quotient] is probably the most important factor that I look at to determine the probability of success.”
Jeffrey Carr agreed, saying that although technical skills are “the price of admission,” positions within his legal department require lawyers to fit into the existing company ethos. “I can fix a lack of credentials or a lack of experience,” he said. “What's not fixable is a cultural mismatch.”
The panelists closed the discussion by offering pieces of advice for aspiring GCs, as well as landmines that in-house attorneys should avoid. Tom Sabatino stressed the importance of careful listening. “Lawyers want to show that they are smart … But one of the skill sets that all good GCs have is the ability to listen, to synthetize information, to figure out what you don't know, to ask questions and to then create a strategy around solving problems,” he said.
For more SuperConference coverage:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBallooning Workloads, Dearth of Advancement Opportunities Prime In-House Attorneys to Pull Exit Hatch
The Reason a GC Abruptly Departs May Not Be What You Think
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250