FTC warns data brokers of possible privacy violations
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has put data brokers on notice, with a series of letters alerting 10 companies that they may be running afoul of federal privacy law.
May 09, 2013 at 08:47 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has put data brokers on notice, with a series of letters alerting 10 companies that they may be running afoul of federal privacy law.
Posing as individuals or representatives of various companies, FTC staff members called 45 brokers and asked for consumer information, purportedly as part of credit, insurance eligibility or employment checks. Data brokers that collect, distribute or sell consumer data constitute consumer reporting agencies under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). As such, they must reasonably verify the identity of organizations seeking information about consumers.
Ten of the 45 companies, however, appeared not to comply with these rules when volunteering consumer information. The companies that received letters included 4Nannies.com, Brokers Data Inc., Case Breakers Inc., Exact Data ConsumerBase, CrimCheck.com, PeopleSearchNow.com, U.S. Information Search, USA People Search, US Data Corp. and one unnamed organization.
The FTC noted that the letters do not mean that the companies in question are under investigation. “Instead,” the agency said, “they serve to remind the companies to evaluate their practices to determine whether they are consumer reporting agencies, and if so, how to comply with that law.”
Read more at the Wall Street Journal.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of privacy issues, see:
GCs predict increase in consumer fraud and privacy class actions
New FTC recommendations target mobile privacy concerns
Google owns up to privacy violations in Street View settlement
Regulatory: Drafting and reviewing your privacy policy
Hiring law firm in wake of data breach gives companies the secrecy of privilege
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has put data brokers on notice, with a series of letters alerting 10 companies that they may be running afoul of federal privacy law.
Posing as individuals or representatives of various companies, FTC staff members called 45 brokers and asked for consumer information, purportedly as part of credit, insurance eligibility or employment checks. Data brokers that collect, distribute or sell consumer data constitute consumer reporting agencies under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). As such, they must reasonably verify the identity of organizations seeking information about consumers.
Ten of the 45 companies, however, appeared not to comply with these rules when volunteering consumer information. The companies that received letters included 4Nannies.com, Brokers Data Inc., Case Breakers Inc., Exact Data ConsumerBase, CrimCheck.com, PeopleSearchNow.com, U.S. Information Search, USA People Search, US Data Corp. and one unnamed organization.
The FTC noted that the letters do not mean that the companies in question are under investigation. “Instead,” the agency said, “they serve to remind the companies to evaluate their practices to determine whether they are consumer reporting agencies, and if so, how to comply with that law.”
Read more at the Wall Street Journal.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of privacy issues, see:
GCs predict increase in consumer fraud and privacy class actions
New FTC recommendations target mobile privacy concerns
Regulatory: Drafting and reviewing your privacy policy
Hiring law firm in wake of data breach gives companies the secrecy of privilege
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's Inspectors General Purge Could Make Policy Changes Easier, Observers Say
Keys to Maximizing Efficiency (and Vibes) When Navigating International Trade Compliance Crosschecks
6 minute readCrypto Industry Eyes Legislation to Clarify Regulatory Framework
SEC Official Hints at More Restraint With Industry Bars, Less With Wells Meetings
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Over 700 Residents Near 2023 Derailment Sue Norfolk for More Damages
- 2Decision of the Day: Judge Sanctions Attorney for 'Frivolously' Claiming All Nine Personal Injury Categories in Motor Vehicle Case
- 3Second Judge Blocks Trump Federal Funding Freeze
- 4Crypto Hacker’s $65 Million Scam Ends in Indictment
- 5Trump's Inspectors General Purge Could Make Policy Changes Easier, Observers Say
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250