California sues JPMorgan over debt collection practices
California Attorney General Kamala Harris is suing JPMorgan Chase & Co. for allegedly running a debt collection mill in an effort to recover credit card debt from thousands of the states consumers.
May 10, 2013 at 09:40 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
California Attorney General Kamala Harris is suing JPMorgan Chase & Co. for allegedly running a “debt collection mill” in an effort to recover credit card debt from thousands of the state's consumers.
The suit accuses the bank of overwhelming California courts with more than 100,000 lawsuits in order to win default judgments against customers who owed the bank money. The issue, Harris says, is that the bank was only able to file the staggering number of suits by repeatedly “cut[ting] corners in the name of speed, cost savings and their own convenience.”
JPMorgan's problematic tactics purportedly included filing incomplete or false documents to bolster its cases, disclosing consumers' credit card numbers and failing to inform some customers that the bank was suing them. The bank also allegedly signed off on documents without thoroughly reviewing them, reminiscent of the “robo-signing” that ran rampant among mortgage lenders in the lead-up to the housing crisis.
“This enforcement action seeks to hold [JPMorgan] accountable for systematically using illegal tactics to flood California's courts with specious lawsuits against consumers,” Harris said.
A JPMorgan spokesman told the Los Angeles Times that the bank stopped filing credit card lawsuits in early 2011, following a companywide review of its debt collection procedures.
Lenders around the country have been accused of using similar methods to collect outstanding consumer debts left over from the worst days of the economic crisis.
For more mortgage-related stories on InsideCounsel, see:
California Attorney General Kamala Harris is suing
The suit accuses the bank of overwhelming California courts with more than 100,000 lawsuits in order to win default judgments against customers who owed the bank money. The issue, Harris says, is that the bank was only able to file the staggering number of suits by repeatedly “cut[ting] corners in the name of speed, cost savings and their own convenience.”
JPMorgan's problematic tactics purportedly included filing incomplete or false documents to bolster its cases, disclosing consumers' credit card numbers and failing to inform some customers that the bank was suing them. The bank also allegedly signed off on documents without thoroughly reviewing them, reminiscent of the “robo-signing” that ran rampant among mortgage lenders in the lead-up to the housing crisis.
“This enforcement action seeks to hold [JPMorgan] accountable for systematically using illegal tactics to flood California's courts with specious lawsuits against consumers,” Harris said.
A JPMorgan spokesman told the Los Angeles Times that the bank stopped filing credit card lawsuits in early 2011, following a companywide review of its debt collection procedures.
Lenders around the country have been accused of using similar methods to collect outstanding consumer debts left over from the worst days of the economic crisis.
For more mortgage-related stories on InsideCounsel, see:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCoinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute readBaker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
Trending Stories
- 1The Importance of Contractual Language in Analyzing Post-Closing Earnout Disputes
- 2People in the News—Jan. 8, 2025—Stevens & Lee, Ogletree Deakins
- 3How I Made Partner: 'Avoid Getting Stuck in a Moment,' Says Federico Cuadra Del Carmen of Baker McKenzie
- 4Legal Departments Dinged for Acquiescing to Rate Hikes That 'Defy Gravity'
- 5Spalding Jurors Return $12M Verdict Against State Farm Insurance Client
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250