GCs discuss building international legal teams
As the business community becomes increasingly internationally driven, more and more legal departments are looking to grow their teams in other countries.
May 10, 2013 at 08:26 AM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
As the business community becomes increasingly internationally driven, more and more legal departments are looking to grow their teams in other countries. While it may be a great benefit to the legal team, the hiring process can be daunting.
Yesterday, four general counsel sat down to talk about best practices in procuring international in-house counsel in “When in Rome: Building an International Legal Department,” an event organized by legal search consultants Major, Lindsey & Africa.
Moderator Michael Sachs, managing director at Major, Lindsey & Africa, kicked off the event by asking the panelists how they know when it's the right time to hire international counsel. Paul Liebenson, GC of ArcelorMittal, said there's no magic formula. “It's really a combination of risk and cost,” he said, pointing especially to the importance of staying in compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) when companies go into other countries. “When you have to worry about corruption, you need to have someone you can trust.”
Rena Hozore Reiss, GC of Hyatt Hotels Corp., said it's also important to manage your client's expectations when hiring international in-house counsel. “We do a calculation of what we need in each region and work backward,” she said. “It's a mix of cultural fit, time zone issues, and what you need on the ground.”
While an international in-house counsel who is a cultural fit is a must-have for all the panelists, Kraig Washburn, GC of Flexera Software, said he also needs someone who knows his business. “Experience in our field is key to a successful candidate,” he said.
The panelists were split on whether their international counsel should be trained in the U.S. Leibenson pointed to an example of one of “the best hires” he ever made was a Brazilian lawyer who had studied in Maine for a year. She is now a senior lawyer at a major Fortune 500 company. But Maria Green, GC of Illinois Tool Works, said it's critical for her to hire someone trained in the U.S. “We want them to understand the culture and the business,” she said.
All the panelists agreed, however, that one of the most important attributes of a potential international in-house counsel is that he can work independently. “The lawyer needs to be able to stand up to the people working around him,” Reiss said, “particularly on the compliance issues.”
Not surprisingly, FCPA was a common theme throughout the presentation, and cited as a main reason for needing lawyers on the ground in certain countries. But the panelists also discussed the reporting structure of international in-house counsel, which they all agree should be a solid line to the GC, as well as best practices for managing these lawyers in other offices and time zones.
Check out Major, Lindsey & Africa for a full video of this event, which it will post next week.
As the business community becomes increasingly internationally driven, more and more legal departments are looking to grow their teams in other countries. While it may be a great benefit to the legal team, the hiring process can be daunting.
Yesterday, four general counsel sat down to talk about best practices in procuring international in-house counsel in “When in Rome: Building an International Legal Department,” an event organized by legal search consultants Major, Lindsey & Africa.
Moderator Michael Sachs, managing director at Major, Lindsey & Africa, kicked off the event by asking the panelists how they know when it's the right time to hire international counsel. Paul Liebenson, GC of ArcelorMittal, said there's no magic formula. “It's really a combination of risk and cost,” he said, pointing especially to the importance of staying in compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) when companies go into other countries. “When you have to worry about corruption, you need to have someone you can trust.”
Rena Hozore Reiss, GC of
While an international in-house counsel who is a cultural fit is a must-have for all the panelists, Kraig Washburn, GC of Flexera Software, said he also needs someone who knows his business. “Experience in our field is key to a successful candidate,” he said.
The panelists were split on whether their international counsel should be trained in the U.S. Leibenson pointed to an example of one of “the best hires” he ever made was a Brazilian lawyer who had studied in Maine for a year. She is now a senior lawyer at a major Fortune 500 company. But Maria Green, GC of Illinois Tool Works, said it's critical for her to hire someone trained in the U.S. “We want them to understand the culture and the business,” she said.
All the panelists agreed, however, that one of the most important attributes of a potential international in-house counsel is that he can work independently. “The lawyer needs to be able to stand up to the people working around him,” Reiss said, “particularly on the compliance issues.”
Not surprisingly, FCPA was a common theme throughout the presentation, and cited as a main reason for needing lawyers on the ground in certain countries. But the panelists also discussed the reporting structure of international in-house counsel, which they all agree should be a solid line to the GC, as well as best practices for managing these lawyers in other offices and time zones.
Check out Major, Lindsey & Africa for a full video of this event, which it will post next week.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhite Castle GC Becomes Chain's First President From Outside Family
Beyond the Title: Developing a Personal Brand as General Counsel
Trending Stories
- 1Can Passive Technology Change the Impaired Driving Trajectory?
- 2Bradley Arant, Moore & Van Allen Join Partner Promotions Parade
- 37th Circ. Rejects Liability Claims Against Freight Broker's Hiring Choices
- 4Sullivan & Cromwell Signals 5-Day RTO Expectation as Law Firms Remain Split on Optimal Attendance
- 5CLOSED: These Georgia Courts Won't Open Jan. 10
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250