Cheat Sheet: Managing the litigation risk of unpaid interns
Summer is approaching, which means its nearly peak season for popsicles, sundresses and summer interns.
May 16, 2013 at 05:45 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Summer is approaching, which means it's nearly peak season for popsicles, sundresses and summer interns. But the joy some companies felt at bringing in these little helpers in the past is somewhat tempered now by the spate of high-profile lawsuits brought against employers by unpaid interns. In InsideCounsel's May issue, we looked at the risk companies face when running an internship program, and how to stay out of the courtroom. Here we'll break it down and provide answers to in-house counsels' key questions about unpaid interns.
What's the danger?
In 2010, the Department of Labor issued a fact sheet explaining how employers can run unpaid internship programs without running afoul of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which states that employers must pay employees at least minimum wage. The criteria for an acceptable unpaid internship program require it to be designed for the benefit of the intern, not the company. And an intern who just does unpaid work with no educational element is definitely benefitting the company.
Former interns at employers such as Fox Searchlight and Hearst Corp. claimed that the programs they participated in violated the FLSA, and though a judge recently denied the Hearst interns class action status, the issue should still be on employers' radar.
Who are the targets?
Though large media companies like Hearst have gotten a lot of publicity, cases have also cropped up against employers, large and small, in other industries. Elite Model Management, a New York modeling agency, and Hamilton College have both faced similar suits.
“Any employer who uses unpaid interns would be subject to scrutiny,” says Poyner Spruill Partner David Woodard.
But what if the programs give academic credit?
That's better, but you still may not be safe. Though the 11th Circuit in Kaplan v. Code Blue Coding and Billing found that students who completed externships required for graduation could not sue for wages, offering academic credit doesn't necessarily absolve you from future litigation.
“If the school is willing to give credit without overseeing what actually happens during the internship, they don't know if the person is participating in classroom instruction or cleaning the restrooms,” says John Thompson, a partner at Fisher & Phillips.
How should companies set up internship programs?
You have three options, really. You can set up an unpaid internship program, do your best to comply with FLSA requirements, work closely with the institution offering academic credit and hope for the best. You can decide it's not worth it and scrap the program completely, which Fisher & Phillips Partner John Thompson says many companies are doing.
Or, you can suck it up and pay your interns. “Unless you are really, really sure your intern program would pass muster, just go ahead and pay minimum wage and overtime,” says Poyner Spruill Partner David Woodard. “That's the safest thing to do.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
8 minute readWhy ACLU's New Legal Director Says It's a 'Good Time to Take the Reins'
'Utterly Bewildering': GCs Struggle to Grasp Scattershot Nature of Law Firm Rate Hikes
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250