Advice for young in-house lawyers: Understanding the value of questions
Answers can only aspire to be important. Questions remain forever relevant, forever eloquent. Answers are science, questions are poetry. We can learn so much more from poetry than science.
May 23, 2013 at 05:15 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
“Answers can only aspire to be important. Questions remain forever relevant, forever eloquent. Answers are science, questions are poetry. We can learn so much more from poetry than science.”
–Guillermo del Toro, The Best American Nonrequired Reading 2011
Lawyers—particularly the young in-house variety—can surprisingly learn a lot from poetry.
While young lawyers do not traditionally go directly into corporate law departments, many companies are beginning to bypass law firms by recruiting recent graduates. Unfortunately, traditional law school education does not adequately prepare recent graduates for the unforeseen importance of business decisions, the issues associated with competing internal departments vying for finite resources and a job that has more to do with negotiating minute business details than analyzing statutes or case law.
As the first in a three-part series focusing on young in-house lawyers, this article highlights how some of the foregoing challenges can be mitigated by understanding the value of questions. In particular, it's essential for young in-house lawyers to recognize the benefits of asking industry-specific questions, asking document template questions and asking questions about how the legal department is perceived internally.
Ask Industry-Specific Questions
The most important issue —above any legal issue—is learning the organization's industry, the associated lexicon (including acronyms) and how the different stakeholders fit within the industry. Because of this, young in-house lawyers need to ask pointed questions about business operations, the associated roles and responsibilities of each department, and any necessary technical or methodological information. Surprisingly, this information may be hard to find. Therefore, young lawyers should:
- Draft and maintain a master list of questions
- Determine who could possibly answer these questions within their organization
- Start sending emails, scheduling meetings, and buying as many lunches as it takes to internalize the relevant answers.
Without this knowledge, a young lawyer will have difficulty asking responding to industry-specific complexities and their interconnected legal distinctions.
Ask Document Template Questions
It is also inevitable that a young in-house lawyer will consistently use, and depend on, document templates. However, in order to provide more than just a “starting point,” young lawyers must question and analyze these templates. First, you need to locate these documents (easier said than done). You would be surprised how many extremely useful documents are “hidden” on your colleague's desktop or saved in some random file folder on a department's shared network. Second, young lawyers need to understand the breadth of their template database (i.e. scan or quickly read all the folders and subfolders). I cannot count how many times I've spent hours working on an agreement only to find that a substantially similar document already exists. Finally, young lawyers need to analyze the purpose of significant provisions within these templates. By finding—and learning the historic reasoning behind these provisions—a lawyer can determine the range of risk a company has historically been willing to accept, gain valuable answers to complex problems previously addressed and learn information that can provide a significant competitive advantage.
Ask Perception Questions
Understanding internal perceptions is also essential. Depending on a company's culture, the legal department can be viewed in many different ways. The department could be viewed as a necessary evil, trusted advisors or possibly as gatekeepers to information and authorizations. Aligning the appropriate designation with the appropriate departments and decision makers is extremely important. These perceptions will almost certainly affect workload, expected timelines and an assortment of other day-to-day factors.
In particular, young lawyers need to make it a significant priority to ask their colleagues, legal superiors and trusted non-legal employees how they think their legal department is perceived within the organization. Not only will this give a young lawyer the chance to change internal perceptions, it will provide the basis to foresee problems, understand unexplainable personal quirks and preemptively modify behavior. Inevitably, this information will help a young lawyer develop the interpersonal skills that are necessary to successfully interact with their business colleagues.
Conclusion
Overall, basic questions are important to the young in-house lawyer. They transform static legal principles into informative guidance and knowledge that can empower young lawyers to answers complex questions, make decisions and ultimately evaluate risk.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCompanies' Obsession With Soft Skills Has Made Prized GC Posts Even Harder to Land
4 minute readMeta Workers Aren't of One Mind on Company's Retreat From DEI, Fact-Checking
Private Equity-Backed Medical Imaging Chain Hires CLO, Continuing C-Suite Makeover
Trending Stories
- 1Midsize Firm Bressler Amery Absorbs Austin Boutique, Gaining Four Lawyers
- 2Bill Would Allow Californians to Sue Big Oil for Climate-Linked Wildfires, Floods
- 3LinkedIn Suit Says Millions of Profiles Scraped by Singapore Firm’s Fake Accounts
- 4Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Lawsuit Over FBI Raid at Wrong House
- 5What It Takes to Connect With Millennial Jurors
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250