Airbnb apartment rental ruled illegal in NYC
New Yorkers hoping to rent out their apartments on Airbnb this summer may have to rethink their plans.
May 24, 2013 at 08:24 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
New Yorkers hoping to rent out their apartments on Airbnb this summer may have to rethink their plans, after an administrative law judge ruled that the website violates an NYC law against operating illegal hotels.
Nigel Warren kicked off the controversy when he rented out his room in a two-bedroom East Village apartment for $100 a night. The renters' five-night stay was apparently without incident, and Warren's roommate didn't mind the arrangement.
New York City special enforcement officers who stopped by the building during Warren's absence weren't so understanding, though. They fined the building's owner, Abe Carrey, more than $40,000 for breaking a 2010 city law that prohibits landlords from renting out single-family homes or apartments for less than 30 days if they are not living in the property at the same time as their guests.
The short-term rental ban was initially geared toward landlords who were turning residential buildings into hotels, and Airbnb argued that it was never intended to apply to infrequent renters like Warren. The site also invoked an exemption in the measure for “houseguests, lawful boarders, roomers and lodgers.”
But ALJ Clive Morrick fined Carrey $2,400, ruling that Warren had indeed violated the law, since his guests were not traditional visitors, i.e. friends or family members. “[The exemption] does not apply to complete strangers who have no, and are not intended to have any, relationship with the permanent occupants,” Morrick wrote, according to Thomson Reuters.
Although Airbnb's terms and conditions remind hosts to comply with local laws, some have criticized the site for not more explicitly educating users about the potential ramifications they could face for illegally renting out their apartments.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of the hospitality and tourism industry, see:
New Yorkers hoping to rent out their apartments on Airbnb this summer may have to rethink their plans, after an administrative law judge ruled that the website violates an NYC law against operating illegal hotels.
Nigel Warren kicked off the controversy when he rented out his room in a two-bedroom East Village apartment for $100 a night. The renters' five-night stay was apparently without incident, and Warren's roommate didn't mind the arrangement.
The short-term rental ban was initially geared toward landlords who were turning residential buildings into hotels, and Airbnb argued that it was never intended to apply to infrequent renters like Warren. The site also invoked an exemption in the measure for “houseguests, lawful boarders, roomers and lodgers.”
But ALJ Clive Morrick fined Carrey $2,400, ruling that Warren had indeed violated the law, since his guests were not traditional visitors, i.e. friends or family members. “[The exemption] does not apply to complete strangers who have no, and are not intended to have any, relationship with the permanent occupants,” Morrick wrote, according to Thomson Reuters.
Although Airbnb's terms and conditions remind hosts to comply with local laws, some have criticized the site for not more explicitly educating users about the potential ramifications they could face for illegally renting out their apartments.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of the hospitality and tourism industry, see:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSenators Grill Visa, Mastercard Execs on Alleged Anticompetitive Practices, Fees
Trump's SEC Likely to Halt 'Off-Channel' Texting Probe That's Led to Billions in Fines
Trump Likely to Keep Up Antitrust Enforcement, but Dial Back the Antagonism
5 minute readFTC Sues Cash-Advance Fintech Dave, Says It Deceives the 'Financially Vulnerable'
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250