Airbnb apartment rental ruled illegal in NYC
New Yorkers hoping to rent out their apartments on Airbnb this summer may have to rethink their plans.
May 24, 2013 at 08:24 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
New Yorkers hoping to rent out their apartments on Airbnb this summer may have to rethink their plans, after an administrative law judge ruled that the website violates an NYC law against operating illegal hotels.
Nigel Warren kicked off the controversy when he rented out his room in a two-bedroom East Village apartment for $100 a night. The renters' five-night stay was apparently without incident, and Warren's roommate didn't mind the arrangement.
New York City special enforcement officers who stopped by the building during Warren's absence weren't so understanding, though. They fined the building's owner, Abe Carrey, more than $40,000 for breaking a 2010 city law that prohibits landlords from renting out single-family homes or apartments for less than 30 days if they are not living in the property at the same time as their guests.
The short-term rental ban was initially geared toward landlords who were turning residential buildings into hotels, and Airbnb argued that it was never intended to apply to infrequent renters like Warren. The site also invoked an exemption in the measure for “houseguests, lawful boarders, roomers and lodgers.”
But ALJ Clive Morrick fined Carrey $2,400, ruling that Warren had indeed violated the law, since his guests were not traditional visitors, i.e. friends or family members. “[The exemption] does not apply to complete strangers who have no, and are not intended to have any, relationship with the permanent occupants,” Morrick wrote, according to Thomson Reuters.
Although Airbnb's terms and conditions remind hosts to comply with local laws, some have criticized the site for not more explicitly educating users about the potential ramifications they could face for illegally renting out their apartments.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of the hospitality and tourism industry, see:
U.S. sues Wyndham hotels over data breaches
Former hotel owner sues Marriott, claims labor conspiracy
American Airlines and Orbitz settle long-running suit
Without women role models, Hilton Worldwide's GC blazed her own trail to the top
New Yorkers hoping to rent out their apartments on Airbnb this summer may have to rethink their plans, after an administrative law judge ruled that the website violates an NYC law against operating illegal hotels.
Nigel Warren kicked off the controversy when he rented out his room in a two-bedroom East Village apartment for $100 a night. The renters' five-night stay was apparently without incident, and Warren's roommate didn't mind the arrangement.
The short-term rental ban was initially geared toward landlords who were turning residential buildings into hotels, and Airbnb argued that it was never intended to apply to infrequent renters like Warren. The site also invoked an exemption in the measure for “houseguests, lawful boarders, roomers and lodgers.”
But ALJ Clive Morrick fined Carrey $2,400, ruling that Warren had indeed violated the law, since his guests were not traditional visitors, i.e. friends or family members. “[The exemption] does not apply to complete strangers who have no, and are not intended to have any, relationship with the permanent occupants,” Morrick wrote, according to Thomson Reuters.
Although Airbnb's terms and conditions remind hosts to comply with local laws, some have criticized the site for not more explicitly educating users about the potential ramifications they could face for illegally renting out their apartments.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of the hospitality and tourism industry, see:
U.S. sues Wyndham hotels over data breaches
Former hotel owner sues Marriott, claims labor conspiracy
Without women role models, Hilton Worldwide's GC blazed her own trail to the top
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCrypto Industry Eyes Legislation to Clarify Regulatory Framework
SEC Official Hints at More Restraint With Industry Bars, Less With Wells Meetings
4 minute readTrump Fires EEOC Commissioners, Kneecapping Democrat-Controlled Civil Rights Agency
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250