Argentine court lifts freeze on Chevron assets in pollution case
An Argentine court on Tuesday lifted a freeze on Chevron Corp.s assets in the country, in the latest victory for the oil company in its long environmental pollution battle with Ecuador.
June 05, 2013 at 07:36 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
An Argentine court on Tuesday lifted a freeze on Chevron Corp.'s assets in the country, in the latest victory for the oil company in its long environmental pollution battle with Ecuador.
The asset freeze had been in effect since last November, when an Argentine judge ruled in favor of the Ecuadorean villagers who won a multibillion penalty against Chevron in 2011. But Argentina's Supreme Court this week held that the company's Argentine subsidiaries “have not participated in the case against [their parent company] and are legally distinct units,” the Associated Press reports.
In 2011, an Ecuadorean judge ruled that Texaco Corp., which Chevron acquired in 2001, had dumped billions of gallons of toxic drilling waste into the country's rainforest while operating in the country in the 1970s and 1980s. The judge ordered Chevron to pay $19 billion in restitution for the pollution, which purportedly damaged the environment and sickened local villagers.
Because Chevron has no refineries, storage terminals or oil wells in Ecuador, the country has attempted to recoup the judgment from the company's international subsidiaries. But those efforts have thus far met with little success. Prior to this week's unfavorable ruling in Argentina, the plaintiffs also failed in their attempt to enforce the judgment in Canada, where a judge ruled that his country's courts had no jurisdiction over the case.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of the Chevron case, see:
Canadian judge stays claim for $19 billion Chevron judgment
Chevron fraud case heads to U.S. as Ecuadorean judge orders seizure of the company's assets
Chevron seeks records of alleged bribes in Ecuadorean oil pollution suit
Brazilian court upholds ban against Chevron and Transocean
Lawsuit accuses Chevron of gross negligence in refinery fire
Ecuadorian plaintiffs sue Chevron in Canada
An Argentine court on Tuesday lifted a freeze on
The asset freeze had been in effect since last November, when an Argentine judge ruled in favor of the Ecuadorean villagers who won a multibillion penalty against
In 2011, an Ecuadorean judge ruled that Texaco Corp., which
Because
For more InsideCounsel coverage of the
Canadian judge stays claim for $19 billion
Brazilian court upholds ban against
Lawsuit accuses Chevron of gross negligence in refinery fire
Ecuadorian plaintiffs sue Chevron in Canada
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250