ExxonMobil seeks dismissal of Mayflower oil spill suits
ExxonMobil Corp. is seeking to dismiss a lawsuit filed by Arkansas residents who claim their property values and health suffered after a March 29 oil spill.
June 10, 2013 at 09:05 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
ExxonMobil Corp. is seeking to dismiss a lawsuit filed by Arkansas residents who claim their property values and health suffered after a March 29 oil spill.
Townspeople in Mayflower claim that some of them have suffered headaches, nausea, chest pain and other ailments following a pipeline rupture that dumped thousands of barrels of oil into the central Arkansas town. Many have also sued for alleged loss of property value.
The oil company's motion to dismiss specifically targets a suit filed by Kathryn Jane Roachell Chunn and Ellen Burgess, who live a few hundred yards away from the spill site, according to KARK 4. Exxon argues in its motion that residents shouldn't be able to sue for lost property values unless the spill directly affected their homes.
The company, which is continuing cleanup operations, says that it will honor “all valid claims.”
For more InsideCounsel coverage of the oil industry, see:
Texas sues BP over Gulf oil spill
First phase of BP spill trial ends
BP faces more than 2,200 new spill lawsuits
Argentine court lifts freeze on Chevron assets in pollution case
Canadian judge stays claim for $19 billion Chevron judgment
Regulatory: What to expect in the energy sector
Nigerians seek $1 billion from Shell for oil spill pollution
ExxonMobil faces lawsuits over Yellowstone River oil spill
ExxonMobil Corp. is seeking to dismiss a lawsuit filed by Arkansas residents who claim their property values and health suffered after a March 29 oil spill.
Townspeople in Mayflower claim that some of them have suffered headaches, nausea, chest pain and other ailments following a pipeline rupture that dumped thousands of barrels of oil into the central Arkansas town. Many have also sued for alleged loss of property value.
The oil company's motion to dismiss specifically targets a suit filed by Kathryn Jane Roachell Chunn and Ellen Burgess, who live a few hundred yards away from the spill site, according to KARK 4. Exxon argues in its motion that residents shouldn't be able to sue for lost property values unless the spill directly affected their homes.
The company, which is continuing cleanup operations, says that it will honor “all valid claims.”
For more InsideCounsel coverage of the oil industry, see:
Texas sues BP over Gulf oil spill
First phase of BP spill trial ends
BP faces more than 2,200 new spill lawsuits
Argentine court lifts freeze on
Canadian judge stays claim for $19 billion
Regulatory: What to expect in the energy sector
Nigerians seek $1 billion from Shell for oil spill pollution
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Recent Controversial Decision and Insurance Law May Mitigate Exposure for Companies Subject to False Claims Act Lawsuits Recent Controversial Decision and Insurance Law May Mitigate Exposure for Companies Subject to False Claims Act Lawsuits](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/fd/84/3d7fb4d146d38b97cfab7af5b7c7/inside-feature-767x633-2.jpg)
Recent Controversial Decision and Insurance Law May Mitigate Exposure for Companies Subject to False Claims Act Lawsuits
7 minute read![Varsity Brands Lures Aboard Keurig Dr. Pepper Legal Chief Varsity Brands Lures Aboard Keurig Dr. Pepper Legal Chief](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/83/dc/a59e06ad42be872191fe7a086901/cheerleaders-767x633.jpg)
![Hasbro Faces Shareholder Ire Over 'Excessive' Toy, Game Inventory Hasbro Faces Shareholder Ire Over 'Excessive' Toy, Game Inventory](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/68/d7/ef03ff8a4ced831763f57095d82f/hasbro-767x633.jpg)
![CLOs Face Mounting Pressure as Risks Mushroom and Job Duties Expand CLOs Face Mounting Pressure as Risks Mushroom and Job Duties Expand](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/corpcounsel/contrib/content/uploads/sites/390/2023/10/Businessman-juggling-business-icons-767x633.jpg)
Trending Stories
- 1ACC CLO Survey Waves Warning Flags for Boards
- 2States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 3Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 4Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 5Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250