5 notable GCs in the news
General counsel sound off on NSA surveillance, gene patentability, "patient dumping" and more
June 14, 2013 at 09:20 AM
10 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Snooping Scandal
“The law authorizes the federal courts to order a company to provide information in certain circumstances, and if Verizon were to receive such an order, we would be required to comply.”
–Randy Milch, general counsel of Verizon Communications Inc.
The news that the National Security Agency (NSA) has been secretly collecting data from the phone calls of Americans nationwide has dominated recent headlines (and sent sales of George Orwell's “1984” soaring). The covert program came to light courtesy of Edward Snowden, a former employee at NSA security contractor Booz Allen Hamilton, who leaked details of the classified surveillance operation to The Guardian and The Washington Post.
Verizon was among the companies that handed over phone records—including phone numbers and data on call length, location and time—to the NSA. The phone company maintains that it “continually takes steps to safeguard its customers' privacy,” but that it would be obliged to comply with the NSA's request for information.
Patents in Peril
“The balance of our patent estate is still valid and enforceable.”
–Rick Marsh, general counsel of Myriad Genetics Inc.
In a much-anticipated decision released this week, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that naturally created human genes cannot be patented. That decision was likely unwelcome to Myriad, the defendant in the case, which held patents on two genes that are linked to an increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer.
The ruling does allow companies to patent synthetically created genetic material, a partial victory that sent Myriad stock rising immediately following the ruling. Unfortunately, that climb was followed by a swift plunge, perhaps because investors fear that other companies will now be able to create tests designed to isolate the cancer-casing genes.
Supposed Settlement
“This is a testament to the old adage: Those who are talking don't know and those who know aren't talking.”
–Gerson Zweifach, general counsel of News Corp.
News Corp. is denying reports that it is close to a settlement that would require it to pay large fines to settle Department of Justice claims that it bribed overseas government officials. The agency has reportedly been investigating whether the news organization violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act by bribing U.K. police for information connected to the company's phone-hacking scandal.
On Monday, a report in The Guardian suggested that News Corp. might have to pay anywhere from $850 million to “billions” of dollars to settle the allegations. But in a meeting with shareholders, Zweifach adamantly denied the existence of any such deal, saying that “there [has] been no discussion of fines. Period.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readOld Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
Lawsuit Against Amazon Could Reshape E-Commerce Landscape
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250