5 notable GCs in the news
General counsel sound off on NSA surveillance, gene patentability, "patient dumping" and more
June 14, 2013 at 09:20 AM
10 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Snooping Scandal
“The law authorizes the federal courts to order a company to provide information in certain circumstances, and if Verizon were to receive such an order, we would be required to comply.”
–Randy Milch, general counsel of Verizon Communications Inc.
The news that the National Security Agency (NSA) has been secretly collecting data from the phone calls of Americans nationwide has dominated recent headlines (and sent sales of George Orwell's “1984” soaring). The covert program came to light courtesy of Edward Snowden, a former employee at NSA security contractor Booz Allen Hamilton, who leaked details of the classified surveillance operation to The Guardian and The Washington Post.
Verizon was among the companies that handed over phone records—including phone numbers and data on call length, location and time—to the NSA. The phone company maintains that it “continually takes steps to safeguard its customers' privacy,” but that it would be obliged to comply with the NSA's request for information.
Patents in Peril
“The balance of our patent estate is still valid and enforceable.”
–Rick Marsh, general counsel of Myriad Genetics Inc.
In a much-anticipated decision released this week, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that naturally created human genes cannot be patented. That decision was likely unwelcome to Myriad, the defendant in the case, which held patents on two genes that are linked to an increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer.
The ruling does allow companies to patent synthetically created genetic material, a partial victory that sent Myriad stock rising immediately following the ruling. Unfortunately, that climb was followed by a swift plunge, perhaps because investors fear that other companies will now be able to create tests designed to isolate the cancer-casing genes.
Supposed Settlement
“This is a testament to the old adage: Those who are talking don't know and those who know aren't talking.”
–Gerson Zweifach, general counsel of News Corp.
News Corp. is denying reports that it is close to a settlement that would require it to pay large fines to settle Department of Justice claims that it bribed overseas government officials. The agency has reportedly been investigating whether the news organization violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act by bribing U.K. police for information connected to the company's phone-hacking scandal.
On Monday, a report in The Guardian suggested that News Corp. might have to pay anywhere from $850 million to “billions” of dollars to settle the allegations. But in a meeting with shareholders, Zweifach adamantly denied the existence of any such deal, saying that “there [has] been no discussion of fines. Period.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250