Patent litigation won’t slow down
According to PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) 2013 Patent Litigation Study, 2012 was a banner year for patent infringement litigation.
June 19, 2013 at 06:25 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
According to PricewaterhouseCoopers' (PwC) 2013 Patent Litigation Study, 2012 was a “banner year for patent infringement litigation.”
There were 5,189 patent litigation filings last year, a 29 percent increase over the number of 2011 filings. Part of the reason for the uptick was a provision in the America Invents Act that limits the number of defendants that could be named in a single suit. The provision caused a boost in the overall number of suits targeting single defendants.
NPEs filed more than half of 2012's patent suits, and their power isn't waning. According to PwC, in the past 12 years, the median damages award for NPEs has averaged twice the median damages award for practicing entities.
Additionally, the number of damages awards exceeding $1 billion jumped last year. Before 2012, only three patent cases ever surpassed the $1 billion mark in damages awarded. But last year alone, three cases each resulted in more than $1 billion.
PwC doesn't anticipate that patent litigation will slow down anytime soon. “Patent infringement litigation shows no sign of waning,” PwC Partner Chris Barry told the Wall Street Journal Law Blog. “Companies … need to be aware and prepared for this growing trend as they plan for the coming years.”
For more IP coverage from InsideCounsel, read:
According to PricewaterhouseCoopers' (PwC) 2013 Patent Litigation Study, 2012 was a “banner year for patent infringement litigation.”
There were 5,189 patent litigation filings last year, a 29 percent increase over the number of 2011 filings. Part of the reason for the uptick was a provision in the America Invents Act that limits the number of defendants that could be named in a single suit. The provision caused a boost in the overall number of suits targeting single defendants.
NPEs filed more than half of 2012's patent suits, and their power isn't waning. According to PwC, in the past 12 years, the median damages award for NPEs has averaged twice the median damages award for practicing entities.
Additionally, the number of damages awards exceeding $1 billion jumped last year. Before 2012, only three patent cases ever surpassed the $1 billion mark in damages awarded. But last year alone, three cases each resulted in more than $1 billion.
PwC doesn't anticipate that patent litigation will slow down anytime soon. “Patent infringement litigation shows no sign of waning,” PwC Partner Chris Barry told the Wall Street Journal Law Blog. “Companies … need to be aware and prepared for this growing trend as they plan for the coming years.”
For more IP coverage from InsideCounsel, read:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readOld Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
Lawsuit Against Amazon Could Reshape E-Commerce Landscape
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250