Managing your boss
When inside counsel call our firm to ask about new opportunities, we often hear some version of I dont like my boss as the key motivator for seeking a move.
June 21, 2013 at 07:25 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
When inside counsel call our firm to ask about new opportunities, we often hear some version of “I don't like my boss” as the key motivator for seeking a move. The more vocal this complaint gets, the more likely it becomes that we will see multiple employer changes over a short period of time when we see the individual's resume. It is also very unlikely that we will ever present that resumé to a client.
I borrow this month's column title from a Harvard Business Review article written more than 30 years ago, but as timely as ever. Google the title and authors Gabarro and Kotter for a very worthwhile read. I thank a client for handing it to me as part of his guidance on culture fit for his law department. The summary: Successful people treat their boss as a client and adapt to serve the boss' work style.
This is far from advice just for junior folks navigating up the pyramid. I had the privilege of participating in InsideCounsel's most recent Project 5/165 workshop, and this theme ran throughout a program devoted to preparing high-potential senior women for general counsel positions. I can't mention names, because confidentiality is critical to the workshop's open and candid discussions. But I took pretty good notes.
So, please trust that I am quoting a Fortune 500 general counsel talking about managing a CEO change: “I had a great relationship with my CEO; he liked summary answers and very short meetings. That suited me. I felt empowered. The new CEO likes to play devil's advocate and will spend an hour immersing in detail. I wanted him to just let me do my job, and I even wondered at first if he had confidence in me. But I adapted to the new style, he takes my advice, and now we get along fine.”
To continue thriving in a role and for a company that she loves, this GC understood intuitively that the burden was on her to make the new reporting relationship work. And work well.
I am about to take this advice to heart. Starting next month, the feel of this column will change considerably. I am going to move away from a first-person approach to offering career advice. In the months ahead, I am going to experiment with various formats for relaying advice from successful general counsel. We may also profile some high-potential future GCs here.
This change comes at the suggestion of InsideCounsel's new publisher, the man behind career-focused initiatives I mentioned last month. I welcome the change, because I want to align myself with the culture at InsideCounsel. This new direction also happens to be a really good idea.
I will miss writing for you in such a personal manner. But as we get this new format right, I believe the Career Advice column will become an even more useful tool for you. I hope you will value tips from your peers and enjoy learning about the career paths taken by fellow inside counsel. As always, I will welcome and appreciate your input and suggestions as we move forward.
Over the past three years, I have offered lots of specific suggestions for success, emphasizing the broad theme of making your own luck. For my final column in this format, I will lead by example and take my #1 piece of career advice: Embrace change.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBallooning Workloads, Dearth of Advancement Opportunities Prime In-House Attorneys to Pull Exit Hatch
The Reason a GC Abruptly Departs May Not Be What You Think
Trending Stories
- 1Can The Threat of a Bar Complaint Be a Settlement Tool?
- 2Sentencing Commission Addresses Inconsistent Definitions of “Loss”
- 3What Are Forbidden Sexual Relations With Clients?
- 4AEDI Takeaways: Demystifying Hype, Changing Caselaw & Harvey’s CEO Talks State of Industry
- 5New England Law | Boston Announces New Dean
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250