Labor: Will border security derail immigration reform?
The Sunday talk shows are abuzz with excitement over the long-awaited debate in the U.S. Senate on immigration reform.
July 01, 2013 at 07:21 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The Sunday talk shows are abuzz with excitement over the long-awaited debate in the U.S. Senate on immigration reform. The Senate Judiciary Committee approved Senate Bill 744, the Border Security, Economic Opportunity and Immigration Modernization Act (S. 744) and on June 11, the Senate voted 82-15 to finally debate immigration reform in earnest. The Senate seems to be more focused in its approach, while the House appears to be more divided. Based on an ambitious and aggressive timeline, the Senate is vowing to have a bill ready before the July 4 recess.
A decisive vote for an immigration bill in the Senate is likely to send a message to the House. The House can adopt the Senate version or come up with its own bill, possibly even before the August recess. If the House puts forth their own bill, Congress will enter the conferencing phase in September and October to craft a compromise and have a comprehensive immigration bill on the President's desk for signature before year's end.
Fixing Our Broken Immigration System
Many problems inherent in the U.S. immigration system are rooted in massive backlogs in applications for available visas and green cards, which S. 744 proposes to fix. The Senate bill addresses green card reform by increasing the numbers of employment-based immigrant visas, also referred to as “green cards,” eliminating per country limits, and streamlining the process for some highly-skilled employees with at least a U.S. master's degree in a science, technology, engineering or mathematics field (also known as STEM).
Some employees could qualify for permanent resident status based on a merit-based point system similar to the Canadian system. In addition, there will be a Blue Card for up to 337,000 farm workers throughout a five-year period, and there will be a new “W” visa for lower-skilled workers. The number of H-1B visas will be doubled, but it will be more expensive and increasingly difficult for employers to avail themselves of that type of nonimmigrant visa.
Legalization and an Enhanced Employer Verification System
Another important component of the immigration reform bill is the ability of millions of undocumented immigrants to come out of the shadows and apply for Registered Provisional Immigrant (RPI) status as long as they can prove that they were physically present in the U.S. on Dec. 31, 2011. The bill also requires that the undocumented immigrant pass a background check, be fingerprinted, prove gainful employment and pay fines and taxes. After a certain number of years in RPI status, people could petition for lawful permanent resident status. Along with that comes a phasing in over a number of years of a mandatory national employer verification system, probably E-Verify or a similar system.
The Border Security “Poison Pill”
Could the issue of border security and how it is measured poison the effort? S. 744 as introduced in the Senate was initially 844 pages long, not to mention the numerous amendments that were considered by the Judiciary Committee. It is anticipated that hundreds of amendments will be filed in the next several weeks and debated right up until a vote is taken on the bill.
Senators Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and John Cornyn (R-TX) already filed amendments to put in place legalization triggers. Senator Grassley's amendment would prohibit the granting of RPI or “registered provisional immigrant” status until the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has maintained effective control of the borders for six months. Senator Cornyn calls for 100 percent monitoring capability on the entire Southern border, a 90 percent apprehension rate on the Southern border, and a biometric exit system for all air and sea ports, before green cards will be given to individuals in the legalization plan.
What is Next?
It is clear that all Americans recognize that immigration has to be addressed now and the vast majority of Americans is ready to support immigration reform. What remains to be seen is whether our political system can get this done without being derailed by partisan roadblocks. Follow the debate!
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllExits Leave American Airlines, SiriusXM, Spotify Searching for New Legal Chiefs
2 minute read'A Warning Shot to Board Rooms': DOJ Decision to Fight $14B Tech Merger May Be Bad Omen for Industry
'Incredibly Complicated'? Antitrust Litigators Identify Pros and Cons of Proposed One Agency Act
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250