Facts & Figures: Litigation driving hiring at law firms, legal departments
From hiring prospects to a surge in patent litigation, an inside look at the numbers that count
July 05, 2013 at 09:54 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Sobering Statistics
Newly minted law school grads don't just have each other to fight for jobs. According to a new employment report from the National Association for Placement, a sizeable percentage of graduates from the class of 2012 still hadn't found jobs nine months after leaving their alma maters. Alums who did find jobs, however, saw their starting salaries jump from the previous year.
12.8% Unemployment rate among 2012 grads as of mid-February, up 0.7 percent from stats for the class of 2011
58% Graduates who have held full-time jobs requiring bar passage for more than a year, up 2 percent from last year
$61,245 National median salary for new graduates, up more than $1,000 from last year
Hiring Hopes
There may be a light at the end of the tunnel for unemployed law school grads, though. A new survey courtesy of Robert Half Legal shows that a significant percentage of law firms and corporate legal departments plan to expand in the second half of 2013.
These planned staffing increases are at least partially driven by an increase in litigation work, although employers anticipate difficulties finding lawyers with the necessary skills.
31% Lawyers surveyed who said that their law firm or company plans to add new positions
50% Respondents who said they plan to maintain staff levels by filling empty positions
2% Companies and law firms that plan to reduce the number of jobs
55% Respondents who expect litigation activity to fuel hiring
53% Respondents who reported difficulty finding skilled legal professionals
Litigation Leap
Patent lawyers could find themselves in high demand in upcoming years, if the 2013 Patent Litigation Study from PricewaterhouseCoopers is any indication. According to the study, the number of patent litigation filings jumped significantly in 2012—along with the number of damages awards totaling more than $1 billion.
Part of that increase is attributable to a portion of the America Invents Act that limits the number of defendants that can be included in a single suit. Non-practicing entities, also known as patent trolls, were responsible for more than half of 2012's patent suits.
5,189 Patent litigation filings in 2012
29% Increase in these filings between 2011 and 2012
3 Total cases with damages awards exceeding $1 billion prior to 2012
3 Cases with damages awards of more than $1 billion in 2012 alone
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBallooning Workloads, Dearth of Advancement Opportunities Prime In-House Attorneys to Pull Exit Hatch
The Reason a GC Abruptly Departs May Not Be What You Think
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250