Using legal analytics systems effectively requires a balance of technology, data and collaboration
In the previous article in this series, I promised a case study to show how one company took a flood of data about legal spend flowing through its inside counsel department and made it into a useful stream of information.
July 10, 2013 at 08:26 AM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
In the previous article in this series, I promised a case study to show how one company took a flood of data about legal spend flowing through its inside counsel department and made it into a useful stream of information. Motorola Solutions, based in Schaumburg, Ill., leveraged technology and process plus internal and external data to control spending and drive new disciplines into its legal and government affairs organization.
Motorola Solutions provides mission-critical communication infrastructure, devices, software and services. The company provides these products and services for enterprise and government customers worldwide. Last year's revenue was $8.7 billion.
During the past several years, Mark Hacker, who was recently named general counsel, has brought a business focus to the legal and government affairs organization by aligning lawyers and professionals with the business colleagues they serve and advise.
“Each one of the practice areas is now more effective at protecting the corporations' assets, mitigating risk and helping produce better margins for the business,” Hacker said.
The practice areas formerly led with their intuition and experience and now are augmenting that with fact-based decision making. Each area requires a specific strategy for marshaling its information in managing the most cost-effective spend. “We improved the business acumen of our team by institutionalizing a training program designed to increase business, financial, and communication skills,” Hacker said.
Karen Dunning, who reports to Hacker, leads legal operations and drove the development of the Legal Spend Management Model.
Dunning and her team began by providing monthly reports to various stakeholders within legal and government affairs. They spent time with all stakeholders to make sure they understood the reports and pointed out key areas to focus on. The reports provided a new lens through which the attorneys could get a new perspective on their cases and how they impacted the budget, as well as the overall financial health of Motorola Solutions.
As the department began to see value in data, Dunning began work on the next phase of developing a data-informed culture. With the help of members of her team, she rolled out the framework for the Legal Spend Management Model. The model included the following components:
- Analytics (Know your data)
- Benchmarking (Know your world)
- Dialogue (Know your business)
- Automate (Digitize for simplicity)
- Architect for Strategy (Improve your results)
Know Your Data
This is the cornerstone of the Legal Spend Management Model. Insights are driven by data and analytics. Yet Motorola Solutions realized it also needed to tell a story through the data. To do so, Motorola Solutions utilized visualization tools that produced easy-to-understand charts and graphs, which helped the lawyers understand the bigger picture. Motorola Solutions focused its analytics in three main areas:
- Summary of Spend – Understanding where the legal spend was allocated (type of work, business unit, practice area) was core to their success and to the Legal Spend Management Model.
- Practice Area Details – Determining the cost drivers of legal expense for each practice area, and understanding which matters, businesses and attorneys are driving legal expense helped focus the team's attention on areas that would offer the greatest impact.
- Law Firm Profiles – Gaining insights into the work each law firm was performing, along with its billing practices and pricing over time allowed for informed decisions about which law firms to send work to.
Know Your World
Dunning understood benchmarking was critical to her department's ability to truly understand how it stacked up in the market and where the company had opportunity for improvement. To do this, they leveraged industry reports and tools that provided quantifiable benchmarks, derived from data about the results law departments in other companies were experiencing. The initial stage of benchmarking focused on attorney rates and patent filings.
Through benchmarking, the Legal and Government Affairs team was able to clearly understand its position in the market and drive data-informed discussions with internal clients (business units) and external resources such as its law firms (see Know your business below).
“Having an 'outside-in' perspective is important to understanding how other companies have optimized their spend,” Hacker said.
Know Your Business
The team also realized that to be successful it could not simply gather data about historical spend and industry benchmarks, it would need to create an open dialogue with all stakeholders, business leaders and partners at the company's law firms.
Through these open discussions, they could better plan for the future and understand the past and present challenges each group faced.
Using analytics and benchmarking, these discussions became data-informed, instead of just subjective reviews of outside counsel performance and estimates of what had historically happened.
“For a law firm to truly be a partner, it must understand our strategy and desired results,” Hacker said.
Digitize for Simplicity
Dunning recognized that she could leverage technology to help reduce the burden placed on the attorneys of reviewing invoices, making it easier to manage their legal expense and ensure greater enforcement of their guidelines. Dunning's team identified a number of outside counsel rules that could be automatically identified and processed by the electronic billing solution, increasing the accuracy of review, and removing the need for attorneys to manually review invoices.
They also recognized that a large portion of invoices going through the patent group were for small dollar amounts. Identifying the disproportionate amount of time it took attorneys to review these invoices, they developed a strategy to have those invoices routed to a central review team. Again, this freed up attorneys' time.
Through this type of automation, Motorola Solutions was able to reduce the overall cost for processing an invoice. At the time they conducted their study, they calculated that manual invoices cost approximately $5.69 to process, while electronic invoices cost only $0.15, a reduction in cost of 97 percent for each electronic invoice transaction.
Improve Results
All of the steps outlined above support the overarching strategy and deliver measurably improved results. (It's important to have a clear vision of your strategy, so you know what results you are looking to achieve.)
What Dunning and Motorola Solutions discovered was that the last component of their Legal Spend Management Model, Architect your Strategy is a critical component. I frequently see this element overlooked by most law departments as they develop their spend management programs.
Dunning and her team transformed the Motorola Solutions culture from an intuition-based one to a data-informed one. You can do it too. But you need to take the time to understand and document your objectives and principles for managing your legal expense. Those objectives and principles should then guide the decisions you make and the tactics you deploy. Keep in mind that, without a clear strategy, it is difficult to implement and sustain any type of change.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![How AI Helped a Big Insurer Reduce Legal Costs by $20M How AI Helped a Big Insurer Reduce Legal Costs by $20M](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/corpcounsel/contrib/content/uploads/sites/390/2024/03/AI-Machine-learning-767x633-4.jpg)
![In-House AI Adoption Stalls Despite Rising Business Pressures In-House AI Adoption Stalls Despite Rising Business Pressures](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/corpcounsel/contrib/content/uploads/sites/397/2023/09/Controlling-AI-767x633.jpg)
![From Reluctant Lawyer to Legal Trailblazer: Agiloft's GC on Redefining In-House Counsel With Innovation and Tech From Reluctant Lawyer to Legal Trailblazer: Agiloft's GC on Redefining In-House Counsel With Innovation and Tech](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/bc/c0/107e388d4b0a8cee2900b4f1ba65/laura-richardson-767x633.jpg)
From Reluctant Lawyer to Legal Trailblazer: Agiloft's GC on Redefining In-House Counsel With Innovation and Tech
7 minute read![Legal Tech's Predictions for Legal Ops & In-House in 2025 Legal Tech's Predictions for Legal Ops & In-House in 2025](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/45/fb/0359af8c466ca69830cf15190f56/2025-ltn-predictions-display-767x633.jpg)
Legal Tech's Predictions for Legal Ops & In-House in 2025
Trending Stories
- 1CFPB Labor Union Files Twin Lawsuits Seeking to Prevent Agency's Closure
- 2Crypto Crime Down, Hacks Up: Lawyers Warned of 2025 Security Shake-Up
- 3Atlanta Calling: National Law Firms Flock to a ‘Hotbed for Talented Lawyers’
- 4Privacy Suit Targets Education Department Over Disclosure of Student Financial Data to DOGE
- 5Colwell Law Group Founder Has Died in Skiing Accident
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250