Companies face more litigation than they did two years ago
A new survey by business consultancy Alix Partners indicates that companies may be facing more litigation than they have in the past two years.
July 18, 2013 at 06:33 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
A new survey by business consultancy Alix Partners indicates that companies may be facing more litigation than they have in the past two years.
The report, which asked corporate legal officers about their companies' legal disputes, said 35 percent of GCs reported that their clients were involved in more legal disputes than they were in the previous 12 months. Only 7 percent of respondents said they had seen the number of legal disputes drop.
Other key findings from the report include:
- Almost all the more than 100 companies surveyed were involved in contract disputes with other companies.
- More than 50 percent of respondents reported being involved in intellectual property cases—most dealing with other companies.
- 10 percent of companies said they were currently dealing with bet-the-company litigation.
- With GCs increasingly unsatisfied with law firm rates, more legal departments are employing new ways to deal with the high cost of litigation, including alternative fee arrangements and bringing more work in-house.
Read the full Litigation & Corporate Compliance Survey.
See more Facts & Figures on InsideCounsel.
A new survey by business consultancy Alix Partners indicates that companies may be facing more litigation than they have in the past two years.
The report, which asked corporate legal officers about their companies' legal disputes, said 35 percent of GCs reported that their clients were involved in more legal disputes than they were in the previous 12 months. Only 7 percent of respondents said they had seen the number of legal disputes drop.
Other key findings from the report include:
- Almost all the more than 100 companies surveyed were involved in contract disputes with other companies.
- More than 50 percent of respondents reported being involved in intellectual property cases—most dealing with other companies.
- 10 percent of companies said they were currently dealing with bet-the-company litigation.
- With GCs increasingly unsatisfied with law firm rates, more legal departments are employing new ways to deal with the high cost of litigation, including alternative fee arrangements and bringing more work in-house.
Read the full Litigation & Corporate Compliance Survey.
See more Facts & Figures on InsideCounsel.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Coinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute read
Baker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
Trending Stories
- 1Blank Rome Formalizes Luxury Brand Practice With New Hire
- 2Phila. Court System Pushed to Adapt as Justices Greenlight Changes to Pa.'s Civil Jury Selection Rules
- 3NASDAQ Beats Back Investor Claims of Bias Against Minority-Owned Businesses
- 4Former Google Legal Exec Joins Ad Tech Unicorn as GC
- 5Fenwick and Baker & Hostetler Add DC Partners, as Venable and Brownstein Hire Policy Advisers
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
