Ford sues Japanese supplier for price-fixing
Ford Motor Co. on Tuesday filed suit against a Japanese auto parts supplier that has admitted to fixing the prices of electrical parts.
July 23, 2013 at 09:16 AM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Ford Motor Co. on Tuesday filed suit against a Japanese auto parts supplier that has admitted to fixing the prices of electrical parts.
Fujikura Ltd. has already forked over $20 million in criminal penalties after pleading guilty to charges that it conspired with competitors to fix prices on wire harnesses and other electrical components.
Ford, the first automaker to sue over the conspiracy, says that it paid $10 billion for wire harnesses from 2000 to 2010, according to International Business Times. The price manipulation reportedly began as early as January 2006 and lasted until 2010, and Ford has not specified what its alleged losses were during that time period.
Other companies accused in the price-fixing scheme include Sumitomo Electric Industries and Yazaki Corp. Sumimoto has denied the charges, but Yazaki paid a $470 criminal fine and saw several of its executives locked up over the scandal.
For more coverage of price-fixing controversies on InsideCounsel, see:
Apple conspired to raise e-book prices, judge says
FTC reportedly launches oil price-fixing investigation
Canada accuses Nestle and Mars of price-fixing chocolate
Judge orders Dow Chemical to pay $1.2 billion for price-fixing
Two Japanese freight companies to pay $18.9 million for price-fixing
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
5 minute read
In-House Lawyers Are Focused on Employment and Cybersecurity Disputes, But Looking Out for Conflict Over AI
SEC Ordered to Explain ‘How and When the Federal Securities Laws Apply to Digital Assets’
5 minute read
Meta Hires Litigation Strategy Chief, Tapping King & Spalding Partner Who Was Senior DOJ Official in First Trump Term
Trending Stories
- 1Newsmakers: Former Pioneer Natural Resources Counsel Joins Bracewell’s Dallas Office
- 2Quiet Retirement Meets Resounding Win: Quinn Emanuel Name Partner Kathleen Sullivan's Vimeo Victory
- 3Avoiding the Great Gen AI Wrecking Ball: Ignore AI’s Transformative Power at Your Own Risk
- 4A Lesson on the Value of Good Neighbors Amid the Tragedy of the LA Fires
- 5Change Is Coming in the Trump Era. For Big Law, Change Is Already Here
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
