Judge dismisses racial bias claim against Paula Deen
A federal judge ruled Monday that a white former employee had no standing to bring claims of racial discrimination against the celebrity chef.
August 13, 2013 at 07:54 AM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
There was a (likely butter-filled) celebration in Paula Deen's home last night. A federal judge ruled Monday that a white former employee had no standing to bring claims of racial discrimination against the celebrity chef.
Lisa T. Jackson, who managed a Savannah, Ga., restaurant Deen owns with her brother, alleged that widespread discrimination against the restaurant's black workers had created a hostile work environment. She also claimed the discrimination was “more personally offensive” since she has biracial nieces.
Judge William T. Moore, of the Federal District Court in Savannah, dismissed those claims, saying Jackson did not meet the standard for protection under federal law. He claimed Jackson was no more than “an accidental victim of the alleged racial discrimination.”
Moore also cautioned against using the court as a mediator in employer/employee disputes, according to The New York Times. The judge said allowing the case to proceed would “serve to conscript federal courts as human-resources departments that are responsible for imposing and monitoring a federally created standard for harmony in the workplace.”
Earlier this summer, Deen's deposition in the case made national news when she admitted using racial epithets in the past. Deen insists she does not tolerate prejudice, but the ensuing controversy caused Food Network to drop her from the channel's programming.
The judge's ruling does not spell the end of the Deen family's legal trouble, however. Judge Moore's order does not affect Jackson's sexual harassment allegations against Earl W. Hiers, Deen's brother. Jackson claims Hiers made lewd remarks towards her and displayed pornography at the Savannah restaurant.
For more issues of discrimination in the workplace, check out these InsideCounsel stories:
5 of the strangest lawsuits making headlines
Dukes v. Wal-Mart plaintiffs hit roadblock in California
Labor: Supreme Court makes it harder for plaintiffs to prevail in harassment and retaliation suits
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250