Minnesota AG takes a stand against patent trolls
MPHJ will be required to pay a civil penalty of $50,000 for each Minnesota company that paid for the privilege of scanning documents to emails.
August 22, 2013 at 05:30 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
There are dozens of pieces of office equipment that workers use every day – like computer monitors, photocopiers and document scanners – that they likely take for granted. But what if office workers were required to pay a royalty each time they used a scanner? It might seem ludicrous to imagine that a common act such as scanning a document to an email address could violate a patent, but that is precisely what one company, MPHJ Technology Investments, is claiming.
But the state of Minnesota is not willing to just sit back and let MPHJ send harassing letters to hundreds of businesses in the Gopher State. It seems that Attorney General Lori Swanson has had just about enough of patent trolls like MPHJ.
Swanson's stance is pretty clear. “Patent trolls shake down small businesses to pay 'license fees' they may not owe to avoid threats of costly litigation,” she said in a statement.
And the state of Minnesota is not afraid to take strong action against the troll in question. MPHJ will be required to pay a civil penalty of $50,000 for each Minnesota company that paid for the privilege of scanning documents to emails. In addition, the state will not allow MPHJ to send further threatening letters without the approval of the attorney general's office.
According to Swanson's office, Minnesota is the first state to come to such an arrangement with a patent troll, though the Obama administration had previously released legislative recommendations on how to address these types of patent aggregators.
Patent trolls have been hiding under metaphorical bridges and striking out at unsuspecting travelers for quite some time now, but perhaps this action by Swanson will spur other states to fight back and end this business threat once and for all.
There are dozens of pieces of office equipment that workers use every day – like computer monitors, photocopiers and document scanners – that they likely take for granted. But what if office workers were required to pay a royalty each time they used a scanner? It might seem ludicrous to imagine that a common act such as scanning a document to an email address could violate a patent, but that is precisely what one company, MPHJ Technology Investments, is claiming.
But the state of Minnesota is not willing to just sit back and let MPHJ send harassing letters to hundreds of businesses in the Gopher State. It seems that Attorney General Lori Swanson has had just about enough of patent trolls like MPHJ.
Swanson's stance is pretty clear. “Patent trolls shake down small businesses to pay 'license fees' they may not owe to avoid threats of costly litigation,” she said in a statement.
And the state of Minnesota is not afraid to take strong action against the troll in question. MPHJ will be required to pay a civil penalty of $50,000 for each Minnesota company that paid for the privilege of scanning documents to emails. In addition, the state will not allow MPHJ to send further threatening letters without the approval of the attorney general's office.
According to Swanson's office, Minnesota is the first state to come to such an arrangement with a patent troll, though the Obama administration had previously released legislative recommendations on how to address these types of patent aggregators.
Patent trolls have been hiding under metaphorical bridges and striking out at unsuspecting travelers for quite some time now, but perhaps this action by Swanson will spur other states to fight back and end this business threat once and for all.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![ACC CLO Survey Waves Warning Flags for Boards ACC CLO Survey Waves Warning Flags for Boards](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/c0/31/1004e572458aa2b2a7464624e175/business-leader-767x633.jpg)
![State AG Hammers Homebuilder That Put $2,000-Per-Day Non-Disparagement Penalty in Buyer Contracts State AG Hammers Homebuilder That Put $2,000-Per-Day Non-Disparagement Penalty in Buyer Contracts](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/corpcounsel/contrib/content/uploads/sites/296/2020/08/lumber-construction-resized.jpg)
State AG Hammers Homebuilder That Put $2,000-Per-Day Non-Disparagement Penalty in Buyer Contracts
3 minute read![Advance Auto Parts Hires GC Who Climbed From Bottom to Top of Lowe's Legal Department Advance Auto Parts Hires GC Who Climbed From Bottom to Top of Lowe's Legal Department](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/corpcounsel/contrib/content/uploads/sites/416/2024/02/Advance-Auto-Parts-Store-1-767x633.jpg)
Advance Auto Parts Hires GC Who Climbed From Bottom to Top of Lowe's Legal Department
2 minute read![RIP DOJ FCPA Corporate Prosecutions RIP DOJ FCPA Corporate Prosecutions](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/3a/5b/1d5ac1e443f3b9b133cd12d9834f/united-states-department-of-justice-11-767x633.jpg)
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Finds Trump Administration Violated Order Blocking Funding Freeze
- 2CFPB Labor Union Files Twin Lawsuits Seeking to Prevent Agency's Closure
- 3Crypto Crime Down, Hacks Up: Lawyers Warned of 2025 Security Shake-Up
- 4Atlanta Calling: National Law Firms Flock to a ‘Hotbed for Talented Lawyers’
- 5Privacy Suit Targets Education Department Over Disclosure of Student Financial Data to DOGE
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250