HIPAA updates bring compliance issues to the forefront for cloud services
Cloud service providers, in particular, will need to be compliant with HIPAA if they plan to do business with healthcare organizations.
August 23, 2013 at 06:06 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Back in the days when healthcare records were stored in giant filing cabinets in manila folders, security was a matter of having strong locks and restricted access. But today, with all of the benefits of electronic health records and cloud storage, matters are a bit more complicated. Healthcare providers have become accustomed to the stringent regulations – and associated penalties – of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) but now, with new regulations looming, other providers will be forced to align themselves with the latest provisions.
Cloud service providers, in particular, will need to be compliant with HIPAA if they plan to do business with healthcare organizations. Updates to HIPAA expand the definition of “business associates,” who must follow the same guidelines as physicians and insurance providers. In fact, the new rules specifically address cloud providers, stating, “Document storage companies maintaining protected health information on behalf of covered entities are considered business associates, regardless of whether they actually view the information they hold.”
Compliance Issues
The new HIPAA guidelines introduce a host of compliance issues that must be addressed, and business associates will now be held to the same strict regulatory guidelines as healthcare providers.
- Breach Notifications: One major change involves the adjusted threshold for breach notifications. In the past, notifications were required when a data breach posed “significant risk of reputational, financial or other harm.” Now, however, providers and associates must notify the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services when unsecured data is breached unless a multi-factor risk assessment determines that there is a low risk of exposure.
- Gap Analysis: In order to bring existing policies and procedures in line with the updated regulations, providers and associates should conduct a risk analysis to assess and address any gaps in policies and procedures, in accordance with 45 C.F.R. 164.308(a)(1) of the security rule.
- Adjust Business Agreement: In order to ensure that all parties are aligned with the new provisions, both providers and associates must update and revise existing agreements, utilizing sample business agreements as provided by the Department of Health and Human Services.
- Encryption Technology: As an additional safeguard, all parties should use encryption technology on protected health information, especially on portable devices, bringing a secondary level of security and minimizing the risk of exposure.
With proper training and awareness, both healthcare providers and business associates can ensure compliance with the new regulations, which, according to DHHS, will help avoid potential monetary penalties of more than $1.5 million in some cases.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Compliance With EU AI Act Lags Behind as First Provisions Take Effect Compliance With EU AI Act Lags Behind as First Provisions Take Effect](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/25/7d/54707a6b409ca288c02206e94940/eu-artificial-intelligence-act-767x633.jpg)
Compliance With EU AI Act Lags Behind as First Provisions Take Effect
![State AG Hammers Homebuilder That Put $2,000-Per-Day Non-Disparagement Penalty in Buyer Contracts State AG Hammers Homebuilder That Put $2,000-Per-Day Non-Disparagement Penalty in Buyer Contracts](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/corpcounsel/contrib/content/uploads/sites/296/2020/08/lumber-construction-resized.jpg)
State AG Hammers Homebuilder That Put $2,000-Per-Day Non-Disparagement Penalty in Buyer Contracts
3 minute read![Fired NLRB Member Seeks Reinstatement, Challenges President's Removal Power Fired NLRB Member Seeks Reinstatement, Challenges President's Removal Power](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/bd/6e/a784bcf54b9d940dfa4f2802d343/gwynne-wilcox-767x633.jpg)
Fired NLRB Member Seeks Reinstatement, Challenges President's Removal Power
![GOP-Led SEC Tightens Control Over Enforcement Investigations, Lawyers Say GOP-Led SEC Tightens Control Over Enforcement Investigations, Lawyers Say](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/nationallawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/398/2024/08/securities-and-exchange-commission-building-sec-2014-10_358719-767x633-1.jpg)
GOP-Led SEC Tightens Control Over Enforcement Investigations, Lawyers Say
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Finds Trump Administration Violated Order Blocking Funding Freeze
- 2CFPB Labor Union Files Twin Lawsuits Seeking to Prevent Agency's Closure
- 3Crypto Crime Down, Hacks Up: Lawyers Warned of 2025 Security Shake-Up
- 4Atlanta Calling: National Law Firms Flock to a ‘Hotbed for Talented Lawyers’
- 5Privacy Suit Targets Education Department Over Disclosure of Student Financial Data to DOGE
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250