Casinos face new money-laundering, compliance rules
The recent agreement between Las Vegas Sands and the federal government resulted in a $47 million price tag for the casino.
September 04, 2013 at 04:00 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
High rollers know they are taking a risk anytime they sit down at a roulette wheel or craps table. But now the casinos themselves must be aware of the risks they are taking when these cash-only gamblers start throwing their money around.
The recent agreement between Las Vegas Sands and the federal government resulted in a $47 million price tag for the casino. The agreement represents the culmination of a two-year investigation into money laundering allegations surrounding a Chinese national who has been accused of being a drug kingpin.
In addition to the monetary penalty, the Sands will review its anti-money laundering policies and file reports with the government.
Due to the large amounts of money that flow through casinos, they are regulated like financial institutions and come under the purview of the U.S. Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. That organization is likely to craft new money-laundering rules for casinos eventually, but in the meantime it could issue guidelines requiring casino hosts to be more vigilant.
Several casinos, including the Sands, have already started their own initiatives to keep ahead of possible new rules. Sands will tie bonuses to employees that report suspicious transactions and pull back bonuses if issues arise. Caesars has expanded its own training and record keeping programs as well, according to The Wall Street Journal.
Casinos naturally wish to cater to the wishes of high rollers, who often transfer large sums of money to private accounts and spend a great deal of cash at the tables. But, in light of the recent incident, it will behoove them to take a careful look at their compliance with federal regulations, as to avoid these types of penalties and further entanglements.
Sands also found itself in hot water last year for allegations that it violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which prohibits the bribery of foreign officials.
Everyone knows that, at the tables at least, the odds favor the house. When it comes to playing against the federal government, the feds – like the dealer – have the advantage.
High rollers know they are taking a risk anytime they sit down at a roulette wheel or craps table. But now the casinos themselves must be aware of the risks they are taking when these cash-only gamblers start throwing their money around.
The recent agreement between Las Vegas Sands and the federal government resulted in a $47 million price tag for the casino. The agreement represents the culmination of a two-year investigation into money laundering allegations surrounding a Chinese national who has been accused of being a drug kingpin.
In addition to the monetary penalty, the Sands will review its anti-money laundering policies and file reports with the government.
Due to the large amounts of money that flow through casinos, they are regulated like financial institutions and come under the purview of the U.S. Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. That organization is likely to craft new money-laundering rules for casinos eventually, but in the meantime it could issue guidelines requiring casino hosts to be more vigilant.
Several casinos, including the Sands, have already started their own initiatives to keep ahead of possible new rules. Sands will tie bonuses to employees that report suspicious transactions and pull back bonuses if issues arise. Caesars has expanded its own training and record keeping programs as well, according to The Wall Street Journal.
Casinos naturally wish to cater to the wishes of high rollers, who often transfer large sums of money to private accounts and spend a great deal of cash at the tables. But, in light of the recent incident, it will behoove them to take a careful look at their compliance with federal regulations, as to avoid these types of penalties and further entanglements.
Sands also found itself in hot water last year for allegations that it violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which prohibits the bribery of foreign officials.
Everyone knows that, at the tables at least, the odds favor the house. When it comes to playing against the federal government, the feds – like the dealer – have the advantage.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKhan Defends FTC Tenure, Does Not Address Post-Inauguration Plans
Best Practices for Adopting and Adapting to AI: Mitigating Risk in Light of Increasing Regulatory and Shareholder Scrutiny
7 minute readCrypto Groups Sue IRS Over Decentralized Finance Reporting Rule
SEC Penalizes Wells Fargo, LPL Financial $900,000 Each for Inaccurate Trading Data
Trending Stories
- 1'Quiet, Appropriate End:' NY Court of Appeals Formally Removes Erin Gall From Bench
- 2Just One Cookie? Justices to Decide Liability for Half-Truths
- 340% Contingency: A New Ruling Just Cost This Plaintiff Team $827K in Legal Fees
- 4Runners-Up and Shout-Outs for Litigator of the Week
- 5Sorry. We Can't Get to Your Case: Judge Speaks Out on Judicial Shortages
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250