The NFL looks to sack shady sites
But the NFL like Tom Brady spotting a zone blitz on the weak side is keenly aware of these counterfeit sites. And members of the NFL legal team have succeeded in sacking thousands of these rogue websites through the use of a groundbreaking anti-counterfeiting strategy.
September 04, 2013 at 06:00 AM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Professional football is arguably the most popular sport in the United States. More than 100 million people watched the Ravens beat the 49ers in the Super Bowl last year, and sales of NFL apparel and merchandise topped $13 billion in 2012.
That figure includes only official, licensed merchandise. It does not take into account cheap knockoff jerseys sold by rogue websites to fans who are looking for a bargain.
But the NFL – like Tom Brady spotting a zone blitz on the weak side – is keenly aware of these counterfeit sites. And members of the NFL legal team have succeeded in sacking thousands of these rogue websites through the use of a groundbreaking anti-counterfeiting strategy.
Sites that purport to sell “cheap jerseys” or ones that promise them from China or in bulk are in no way associated with the NFL, and fans who think they are getting a bargain from these deals are really ending up with a bust of Ryan Leaf-like proportions, with shoddy quality and little recourse if something is wrong.
In order to address these counterfeiters, the NFL has developed a strategy that combines in-depth data and data intelligence to aid in its litigation. The league has also made adjustments – like Bill Belichick at halftime – to stay ahead of the rogue websites and their increasingly complex tactics and growing numbers.
Anyone who is interested in this topic can sign up for a free webinar, “A Winning Strategy: How the NFL Tackles Rogue Websites,” taking place on Tuesday, September 17, 2013 at 1pm ET. The one-hour webinar will feature NFL legal team members Dolores F. DiBella, Associate Counsel, and Nancy Wygand, Sr. Trademark and Digital Rights Manager, who will share the secret of their success.
To learn more about the webinar or to register for the event, click here so you can learn how to launch a cover-2 defense against counterfeiters.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCoinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute readBaker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250