Big Tobacco’s claim against State of New York extinguished
The $800 million claim filed against New York asserted that in 2003 the state had erroneously collected payment on untaxed cigarettes sold on Indian reservations
September 12, 2013 at 05:09 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
An $800 million claim filed against the State of New York by Big Tobacco companies has been shot down, according to the Office of New York Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman. The three-judge special panel presiding over the case also ruled that Big Tobacco is responsible for paying an additional $92 million in back payments for delaying repayment schedule.
New York was one of 52 states and territories that took legal action against cigarette makers in the mid 1990's in an attempt to recoup healthcare costs and stop a conspiracy to hide negative health effects. The result of this suit was the “Master Settlement Agreement” of 1998.
The MSA required Big Tobacco to make substantial escrow payments to the states involved in perpetuity. The amount of money owed would be based on the sales figures of taxable cigarettes within that state or province. The agreement also stated that Big Tobacco would be eligible to a discounted repayment schedule if several conditions were met; including if cigarette sales fell below a predetermined figure, or the litigation directly impacted sales figures.
The $800 million claim filed against New York asserted that in 2003, the state had erroneously collected payment on cigarettes sold at Indian reservations (which are not taxed), and owed them the money collected, plus a discount for unit sales dipping below a reasonable number as a result.
But the Sept. 11, 2013, ruling found that this was not the case, and ordered Big Tobacco to continue to repay the original agreed upon amount, plus interest on the money that had been withheld since 2003.
“Under New York's escrow statute, only sales of cigarettes on which New York state excise taxes have been paid trigger the escrow requirement. However, for well over 50 years, with the full knowledge of the participating manufacturers and specifically up to and including 2003, New York did not require state excise taxes to be paid on cigarette sales to or on Indian reservations,” a press release from Schneiderman's office said.
The ruling affects only cigarettes sold in the 2003, and cigarette manufacturers are expected to make similar claims on other years.
The New York Attorney General warned that cigarette manufacturers frequently attempted to falsify figures to exempt themselves from the payment plans issued with the MSA, and warned other settlement winners to remain vigilant.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Haynes and Boone Expands in New York With 7-Lawyer Seward & Kissel Fund Finance, Securitization Team
- 2Upstart Insurer That's Wowing Industry Hires AIG Legal Exec to Help Guide Global Expansion
- 3Connecticut Lawyers in Spotlight for Repping FBI Agents
- 4SEC Sued for Failing to Reveal Records Involving Simpson Thacher Attorney
- 5Lawsuit Accuses University of California of Racial Discrimination in Admissions
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250