Lawyer calls Yelp’s suit against him retaliation
Yelp Inc.the website that allows almost anyone to review businesses around the worldis nothing more than a bully, according to one unhappy customer, who happens to be a lawyer.
September 12, 2013 at 06:26 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Yelp Inc.—the website that allows almost anyone to review businesses around the world—is nothing more than a bully, according to one unhappy customer who happens to be a lawyer.
Julian McMillan, who owns a small law firm in San Diego, sued Yelp in small claims court earlier this year, claiming the company did not follow through with their agreement when he bought ads to promote his business on the site. A judge agreed with McMillan's claims and ordered Yelp to pay McMillan $2,700 as reimbursement for money he spent on the ads. Yelp appealed, arguing that neither McMillan nor the judge understand Yelp's contract.
And this is where the story takes a strange turn.
In August, days before Yelp's appeal was set to go to court, the Internet company filed suit against McMillan for reasons completely unrelated to the ads dispute. Yelp claimed in this second suit that McMillan planted fake reviews of his own law firm, in violation of Yelp's terms of service. McMillan says this suit is nothing more than a bully looking to retaliate.
Yelp says in its suit that back in 2010, McMillan's employees posted positive reviews of the firm, claiming the reviews were posted from the building in which McMillan's firm is located, and says McMillan belonged to a group of lawyers who posted positive reviews of each other. Yelp may seek as much as $25,000 in damages.
“This is their way of swatting down a gnat,” McMillan told BloombergBusinessweek. “They're trying to get me to spend money because they want to give pause to the next business that sues them.”
Yelp contends that the timing of the suit has nothing to do with McMillan's earlier victory against the company. “We take a very aggressive stance against all attempts to mislead consumers,” Yelp spokeswoman Kristen Whisenand said in an e-mail to BloombergBusinessweek. “McMillan's behavior is particularly disappointing given they have targeted some of the most vulnerable consumers of all: individuals who are at risk of losing everything and are using Yelp to find assistance.”
Historically, Yelp isn't known as a company to sue for fake reviews. In fact, it has an algorithm in place specifically to weed out the phonies. So Yelp's suit against McMillan begs the question: Is this the beginning of many suits against merchants to come from Yelp or is this just a loser looking for revenge?
Read more InsideCounsel stories about online reviews and the courtroom:
Yelp Inc.—the website that allows almost anyone to review businesses around the world—is nothing more than a bully, according to one unhappy customer who happens to be a lawyer.
Julian McMillan, who owns a small law firm in San Diego, sued Yelp in small claims court earlier this year, claiming the company did not follow through with their agreement when he bought ads to promote his business on the site. A judge agreed with McMillan's claims and ordered Yelp to pay McMillan $2,700 as reimbursement for money he spent on the ads. Yelp appealed, arguing that neither McMillan nor the judge understand Yelp's contract.
And this is where the story takes a strange turn.
In August, days before Yelp's appeal was set to go to court, the Internet company filed suit against McMillan for reasons completely unrelated to the ads dispute. Yelp claimed in this second suit that McMillan planted fake reviews of his own law firm, in violation of Yelp's terms of service. McMillan says this suit is nothing more than a bully looking to retaliate.
Yelp says in its suit that back in 2010, McMillan's employees posted positive reviews of the firm, claiming the reviews were posted from the building in which McMillan's firm is located, and says McMillan belonged to a group of lawyers who posted positive reviews of each other. Yelp may seek as much as $25,000 in damages.
“This is their way of swatting down a gnat,” McMillan told BloombergBusinessweek. “They're trying to get me to spend money because they want to give pause to the next business that sues them.”
Yelp contends that the timing of the suit has nothing to do with McMillan's earlier victory against the company. “We take a very aggressive stance against all attempts to mislead consumers,” Yelp spokeswoman Kristen Whisenand said in an e-mail to BloombergBusinessweek. “McMillan's behavior is particularly disappointing given they have targeted some of the most vulnerable consumers of all: individuals who are at risk of losing everything and are using Yelp to find assistance.”
Historically, Yelp isn't known as a company to sue for fake reviews. In fact, it has an algorithm in place specifically to weed out the phonies. So Yelp's suit against McMillan begs the question: Is this the beginning of many suits against merchants to come from Yelp or is this just a loser looking for revenge?
Read more InsideCounsel stories about online reviews and the courtroom:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCoinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute readBaker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250