J.P. Morgan to beef up its risk and compliance division
J.P. Morgan plans to spend an additional $4 billion and commit 5,000 extra employees to risk and compliance this year.
September 16, 2013 at 07:24 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.'s recent legal challenges almost makes Bernie Madoff look like Pope Benedict. Fraud? Check. Failed mortgages? Check. Bribery and falsifying bank records? Check and check.
J.P. Morgan is looking to clean up its act in a big way, and according to one recent Wall Street Journal (WSJ) report, the company's compliance sector is about to receive a huge boost. The report says J.P. Morgan plans to spend an additional $4 billion and commit 5,000 extra employees to risk and compliance this year to clean up the company's issues.
“Fixing our controls issues is job number one,” Chief Executive Officer James Dimon told the WSJ in an interview. “This is a huge investment of people, time and money… but it will make us stronger in the long run.”
J.P. Morgan has spent more than $17 billion on legal fees since 2008, according to securities filings. An analysis by FBR Capital Markets reveals that tab is more than any of the company's financial rivals, even similarly embattled Bank of America ($16.1 billion). The bank also operates under four different regulatory enforcement actions—more than any other financial institution—and still faces at least seven different investigations by the U.S. Department of Justice.
The largest portion of the increased compliance spending will come from increased staffing. The company plans to hire 3,000 people to the bank's control staff, while an additional 2,000 people will be re-assigned to risk and compliance from within the business division. According to the WSJ, this will bring J.P. Morgan's total risk and compliance staff up to 15,000, more than double the staff's size from the start of 2012.
The company has also hired consultants from McKinsey & Co., Ernst & Young and other firms to help with compliance issues. J.P. Morgan estimates it has provided 750,000 hours of training on risk and compliance issues in the past year.
J.P. Morgan is looking to clean up its act in a big way, and according to one recent Wall Street Journal (WSJ) report, the company's compliance sector is about to receive a huge boost. The report says J.P. Morgan plans to spend an additional $4 billion and commit 5,000 extra employees to risk and compliance this year to clean up the company's issues.
“Fixing our controls issues is job number one,” Chief Executive Officer James Dimon told the WSJ in an interview. “This is a huge investment of people, time and money… but it will make us stronger in the long run.”
J.P. Morgan has spent more than $17 billion on legal fees since 2008, according to securities filings. An analysis by FBR Capital Markets reveals that tab is more than any of the company's financial rivals, even similarly embattled
The largest portion of the increased compliance spending will come from increased staffing. The company plans to hire 3,000 people to the bank's control staff, while an additional 2,000 people will be re-assigned to risk and compliance from within the business division. According to the WSJ, this will bring J.P. Morgan's total risk and compliance staff up to 15,000, more than double the staff's size from the start of 2012.
The company has also hired consultants from McKinsey & Co.,
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhat to Know About the New 'Overlapping Directorship' Antitrust Development
4 minute readTurning Over Legal Tedium to AI Requires Lots of Unglamorous Work on Front End
6 minute readKhan Defends FTC Tenure, Does Not Address Post-Inauguration Plans
Best Practices for Adopting and Adapting to AI: Mitigating Risk in Light of Increasing Regulatory and Shareholder Scrutiny
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1US Soccer Monopoly Trial Set to Kick Off in Brooklyn Federal Court
- 2NY AG James Targets Crypto Fraud Which Allegedly Ensnared Victims With Fake Jobs
- 3The 'Motherhood Advantage' in Law: Time to Flip the Script
- 4Fenwick & West Shutters Decade-Old Shanghai Office
- 5Thompson Coe, 2 Lawyers, Hit by $1M+ Legal Mal Suit
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250