Median pay for corporate directors increases modestly to $227K
Cash retainers for directors grew 7 percent at the median to a high of $80,000. Total cash compensation grew to $100,000
September 18, 2013 at 06:03 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Corporate directors might be getting more cash now than they did a year ago, but it's a modest increase given the expansion of boards' responsibilities, according to a recent analysis by consulting firm Towers Watson & Co.
Last year, the median pay for outside directors at the 500 largest U.S. companies was $227,000, up 3 percent from $220,000 in 2011. While directors usually receive a mix of equity, cash and fees for attending meetings, the increase was driven by growth in cash compensation, according to Doug Friske, global head of executive compensation consulting at Towers Watson, which analyzed proxies through June 30.
“Cash retainers are playing a larger role in the compensation mix for outside directors as the majority of companies have now eliminated meeting fees, reflecting the evolution of director roles to 24/7 commitments,” Friske said in a statement. “While director pay increases in the early years of this decade were primarily driven by rising equity values, last year's increase was fueled by growth in cash compensation.”
Cash retainers for directors grew 7 percent at the median to a high of $80,000. Total cash compensation grew to $100,000. Stock awards didn't increase at the median last year.
Federal regulations have also impacted director pay: Since the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, audit committees have typically had the highest-paid directors due to their increased responsibilities and greater time commitment. The Dodd-Frank Act has also led to more meetings with shareholders, and thus, bigger commitments from compensation committee directors.
“Directors on the compensation committee also saw a jump in pay last year as the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act and its required 'say-on-pay' votes have led to more disclosures and meetings with shareholders,” The Wall Street Journal's Emily Chasan noted in a blog post.
While retainers are rising, companies are shifting away from paying board members for attending meetings. In fact, just over a quarter (28 percent) of companies paid meeting fees to directors, down from 32 percent in 2011.
“The demand for experienced, talented directors to serve on boards remains strong and will likely grow as companies address the retirement of long-standing members and pursue greater member diversity,” Friske added. “As a result, we expect companies will continue to evaluate their overall director compensation programs and policies to ensure they are able to attract the best directors to their boards.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhat to Know About the New 'Overlapping Directorship' Antitrust Development
4 minute readTurning Over Legal Tedium to AI Requires Lots of Unglamorous Work on Front End
6 minute readKhan Defends FTC Tenure, Does Not Address Post-Inauguration Plans
Best Practices for Adopting and Adapting to AI: Mitigating Risk in Light of Increasing Regulatory and Shareholder Scrutiny
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 2'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 3Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
- 4On the Move and After Hours: Meyner and Landis; Cooper Levenson; Ogletree Deakins; Saiber
- 5State Budget Proposal Includes More Money for Courts—for Now
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250