House Subcommittee holds hearing on importance of worker centers
The House Subcommittee on Health, Employment, Labor, and Pensions is holding a hearing titled The Future of Union Organizing.
September 20, 2013 at 06:46 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The House Subcommittee on Health, Employment, Labor, and Pensions is holding a hearing titled “The Future of Union Organizing.” The focus of the hearing is to discuss the increasing importance of worker centers within the union movement—and what their roles really should be.
First, an explanation: Worker centers are non-profit organizations that provide services for workers in construction, restaurants, retail, food processing, agricultural, landscaping and domestic professions. They have garnered attention of late for assisting employees in these professions with staging what some call strikes in an effort to secure higher wages, better benefits and the right to form unions.
Right-leaning critics believe that worker centers have no place in this role because they aren't themselves unions.
“The primary difference between these organizations and the unions that created them is that worker centers don't deal directly with an employer,” Richard Berman, executive director for the Center for Union Facts, a conservative special interest group critical of union activity, wrote in an op-ed for Forbes. “This allows worker centers to circumvent the National Labor Relations Act's provisions that regulate how and when unions can picket and can interact with both employees and management.”
But proponents of worker centers disagree, claiming the worker centers are independent, low funded agencies rightfully offering assistance where it's needed.
“Unions did not create worker centers, and most worker centers receive little or no funding from unions. Often operating on miniscule budgets, many probably wish they were union-funded,” John Logan, professor at San Francisco State University, wrote in a recent column for The Hill. “They help vulnerable workers retrieve stolen wages, improve dangerous and unhealthy conditions, and educate workers about federal and state labor and employment laws.”
What both sides do agree on, however, is they want an answer to the question: What, if any, is the role of worker centers within the American workforce? And hopefully, the House Subcomittee hearing will answer that question.
The House Subcommittee on Health, Employment, Labor, and Pensions is holding a hearing titled “The Future of Union Organizing.” The focus of the hearing is to discuss the increasing importance of worker centers within the union movement—and what their roles really should be.
First, an explanation: Worker centers are non-profit organizations that provide services for workers in construction, restaurants, retail, food processing, agricultural, landscaping and domestic professions. They have garnered attention of late for assisting employees in these professions with staging what some call strikes in an effort to secure higher wages, better benefits and the right to form unions.
Right-leaning critics believe that worker centers have no place in this role because they aren't themselves unions.
“The primary difference between these organizations and the unions that created them is that worker centers don't deal directly with an employer,” Richard Berman, executive director for the Center for Union Facts, a conservative special interest group critical of union activity, wrote in an op-ed for Forbes. “This allows worker centers to circumvent the National Labor Relations Act's provisions that regulate how and when unions can picket and can interact with both employees and management.”
But proponents of worker centers disagree, claiming the worker centers are independent, low funded agencies rightfully offering assistance where it's needed.
“Unions did not create worker centers, and most worker centers receive little or no funding from unions. Often operating on miniscule budgets, many probably wish they were union-funded,” John Logan, professor at San Francisco State University, wrote in a recent column for The Hill. “They help vulnerable workers retrieve stolen wages, improve dangerous and unhealthy conditions, and educate workers about federal and state labor and employment laws.”
What both sides do agree on, however, is they want an answer to the question: What, if any, is the role of worker centers within the American workforce? And hopefully, the House Subcomittee hearing will answer that question.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNLRB Blisters Skilled Care Home Chain That Terminated Nursing Assistant Who Complained About Wages
6 minute readClass Certification, Cash-Sweep Cases Among Securities Litigation Trends to Watch in 2025
6 minute readJetBlue Airways Will Pay $2M to Settle DOT Charges of Chronically Delayed Flights
Trending Stories
- 1Restoring Trust in the Courts Starts in New York
- 2'Pull Back the Curtain': Ex-NFL Players Seek Discovery in Lawsuit Over League's Disability Plan
- 3Tensions Run High at Final Hearing Before Manhattan Congestion Pricing Takes Effect
- 4Improper Removal to Fed. Court Leads to $100K Bill for Blue Cross Blue Shield
- 5Michael Halpern, Beloved Key West Attorney, Dies at 72
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250