JOBS Act opens up online funding to startups
Starting today, entrepreneurs have a whole new world open for raising investment funds for their new businesses.
September 23, 2013 at 06:18 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Starting today, entrepreneurs have a whole new world open for raising investment funds for their new businesses.
A part of the Jumpstart Our Business Start-ups (JOBS) Act takes affect today, allowing owners of startup companies to ask for equity investments in the public forum, such as through social media sites such as LinkedIn and Twitter as well as other places on the Internet. According to the legislation, these “emerging growth” businesses may raise as much as $1 million per year online.
The purpose of the JOBS Act was to give the job market a boost by encouraging the growth of new businesses. And entrepreneurs couldn't be happier, saying the legislation addresses the recurrent problem of having to have the right connections to raise enough capital in some cases to get a business going.
“How many entrepreneurs are there across the U.S., even in the Midwest, who have these great ideas but no way to tap into that capital?” Entrepreneur Todd Dipaola, owner of ForeFund Capital, told the New York Times. ForeFund is a platform that will allow real estate startups to raise money from investors.
Critics, however, believe there is a lot of risk in the new legislation, warning that deregulating the way entrepreneurs raise funds opens up the possibility for fraud or not-so-serious startups to get money they may not deserve.
Previous to the JOBS Act, entrepreneurs had to raise all of their funds privately—at least until they were ready to enter the public marketplace.
Read more about this story on the New York Times.
For more InsideCounsel stories and columns about the JOBS Act, see:
Starting today, entrepreneurs have a whole new world open for raising investment funds for their new businesses.
A part of the Jumpstart Our Business Start-ups (JOBS) Act takes affect today, allowing owners of startup companies to ask for equity investments in the public forum, such as through social media sites such as
The purpose of the JOBS Act was to give the job market a boost by encouraging the growth of new businesses. And entrepreneurs couldn't be happier, saying the legislation addresses the recurrent problem of having to have the right connections to raise enough capital in some cases to get a business going.
“How many entrepreneurs are there across the U.S., even in the Midwest, who have these great ideas but no way to tap into that capital?” Entrepreneur Todd Dipaola, owner of ForeFund Capital, told the
Critics, however, believe there is a lot of risk in the new legislation, warning that deregulating the way entrepreneurs raise funds opens up the possibility for fraud or not-so-serious startups to get money they may not deserve.
Previous to the JOBS Act, entrepreneurs had to raise all of their funds privately—at least until they were ready to enter the public marketplace.
Read more about this story on the
For more InsideCounsel stories and columns about the JOBS Act, see:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCrypto Groups Sue IRS Over Decentralized Finance Reporting Rule
SEC Penalizes Wells Fargo, LPL Financial $900,000 Each for Inaccurate Trading Data
US Reviewer of Foreign Transactions Sees More Political, Policy Influence, Say Observers
Pre-Internet High Court Ruling Hobbling Efforts to Keep Tech Giants from Using Below-Cost Pricing to Bury Rivals
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Restoring Trust in the Courts Starts in New York
- 2'Pull Back the Curtain': Ex-NFL Players Seek Discovery in Lawsuit Over League's Disability Plan
- 3Tensions Run High at Final Hearing Before Manhattan Congestion Pricing Takes Effect
- 4Improper Removal to Fed. Court Leads to $100K Bill for Blue Cross Blue Shield
- 5Michael Halpern, Beloved Key West Attorney, Dies at 72
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250