JOBS Act opens up online funding to startups
Starting today, entrepreneurs have a whole new world open for raising investment funds for their new businesses.
September 23, 2013 at 06:18 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Starting today, entrepreneurs have a whole new world open for raising investment funds for their new businesses.
A part of the Jumpstart Our Business Start-ups (JOBS) Act takes affect today, allowing owners of startup companies to ask for equity investments in the public forum, such as through social media sites such as LinkedIn and Twitter as well as other places on the Internet. According to the legislation, these “emerging growth” businesses may raise as much as $1 million per year online.
The purpose of the JOBS Act was to give the job market a boost by encouraging the growth of new businesses. And entrepreneurs couldn't be happier, saying the legislation addresses the recurrent problem of having to have the right connections to raise enough capital in some cases to get a business going.
“How many entrepreneurs are there across the U.S., even in the Midwest, who have these great ideas but no way to tap into that capital?” Entrepreneur Todd Dipaola, owner of ForeFund Capital, told the New York Times. ForeFund is a platform that will allow real estate startups to raise money from investors.
Critics, however, believe there is a lot of risk in the new legislation, warning that deregulating the way entrepreneurs raise funds opens up the possibility for fraud or not-so-serious startups to get money they may not deserve.
Previous to the JOBS Act, entrepreneurs had to raise all of their funds privately—at least until they were ready to enter the public marketplace.
Read more about this story on the New York Times.
For more InsideCounsel stories and columns about the JOBS Act, see:
Technology: Delay in crowdfunding rulemaking creates questions and opportunities
How the immigration policy stalemate is hurting businesses and the economy
Regulatory: The JOBS Act and materiality determination in private placements
Starting today, entrepreneurs have a whole new world open for raising investment funds for their new businesses.
A part of the Jumpstart Our Business Start-ups (JOBS) Act takes affect today, allowing owners of startup companies to ask for equity investments in the public forum, such as through social media sites such as
The purpose of the JOBS Act was to give the job market a boost by encouraging the growth of new businesses. And entrepreneurs couldn't be happier, saying the legislation addresses the recurrent problem of having to have the right connections to raise enough capital in some cases to get a business going.
“How many entrepreneurs are there across the U.S., even in the Midwest, who have these great ideas but no way to tap into that capital?” Entrepreneur Todd Dipaola, owner of ForeFund Capital, told the
Critics, however, believe there is a lot of risk in the new legislation, warning that deregulating the way entrepreneurs raise funds opens up the possibility for fraud or not-so-serious startups to get money they may not deserve.
Previous to the JOBS Act, entrepreneurs had to raise all of their funds privately—at least until they were ready to enter the public marketplace.
Read more about this story on the
For more InsideCounsel stories and columns about the JOBS Act, see:
Technology: Delay in crowdfunding rulemaking creates questions and opportunities
How the immigration policy stalemate is hurting businesses and the economy
Regulatory: The JOBS Act and materiality determination in private placements
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGOP Now Holds FTC Gavel, but Dems Signal They'll Be a Rowdy Minority
6 minute readTrump's Inspectors General Purge Could Make Policy Changes Easier, Observers Say
Keys to Maximizing Efficiency (and Vibes) When Navigating International Trade Compliance Crosschecks
6 minute readCrypto Industry Eyes Legislation to Clarify Regulatory Framework
Trending Stories
- 1Big Law Firms Sheppard Mullin, Morgan Lewis and Baker Botts Add Partners in Houston
- 2Lack of Jurisdiction Dooms Child Sex Abuse Claim Against Archdiocese of Philadelphia, says NJ Supreme Court
- 3DC Lawsuits Seek to Prevent Mass Firings and Public Naming of FBI Agents
- 4Growth of California Firms Exceeded Expectations, Survey of Managing Partners Says
- 5Blank Rome Adds Life Sciences Trio From Reed Smith
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250