Amazon sued over requiring security screenings on unpaid time
The screenings took place when employees entered the building and again after they clocked out for lunch and for the day.
October 15, 2013 at 06:12 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Mornings are generally not something people look forward to. Whether it's a grueling commute or a 9 a.m. sales call, it's safe to assume most would rather catch a couple extra minutes of sleep than go through the daybreak ceremony. That's especially true for workers at Amazon, who are suing the online shopping giant for subjecting them to unpaid security screenings as part of their morning routine.
On Oct. 14, a Pennsylvania man filed a class action law suit alleging that Amazon put him and other workers through extensive 10-20 minute security screenings when they were off the clock. The screenings took place when employees entered the building and again after they clocked out for lunch and for the day, during which they were not being paid.
The complaint was filed in a Philadelphia court house and alleges that daily, over 100 workers were subjected to these extensive and unpaid security screenings. The suit attempts to recoup lost wages for the time associated with the frisks.
“Defendants have never paid warehouse workers for time spent processing through this required post-shift screening process prior to exiting the Amazon Fulfillment Center,” Amazon said in court documents stated. “As a result of the compensation practice utilized by defendants, warehouse workers are not compensated for all time during which they were required to be on the premises of the Amazon Fulfillment Center.”
This is the second suit against Amazon alleging improper compensation in relation to security screening time. A similar suit was brought in September by a group of workers in a Tennessee fulfillment center. Plaintiffs in that case where offered a settlement that reimbursed them for the time that they lost during the frisks.
In other recent Amazon news, the company recently won a $600 million contract over IBM to store information for the Central intelligence Agency.
Mornings are generally not something people look forward to. Whether it's a grueling commute or a 9 a.m. sales call, it's safe to assume most would rather catch a couple extra minutes of sleep than go through the daybreak ceremony. That's especially true for workers at Amazon, who are suing the online shopping giant for subjecting them to unpaid security screenings as part of their morning routine.
On Oct. 14, a Pennsylvania man filed a class action law suit alleging that Amazon put him and other workers through extensive 10-20 minute security screenings when they were off the clock. The screenings took place when employees entered the building and again after they clocked out for lunch and for the day, during which they were not being paid.
The complaint was filed in a Philadelphia court house and alleges that daily, over 100 workers were subjected to these extensive and unpaid security screenings. The suit attempts to recoup lost wages for the time associated with the frisks.
“Defendants have never paid warehouse workers for time spent processing through this required post-shift screening process prior to exiting the Amazon Fulfillment Center,” Amazon said in court documents stated. “As a result of the compensation practice utilized by defendants, warehouse workers are not compensated for all time during which they were required to be on the premises of the Amazon Fulfillment Center.”
This is the second suit against Amazon alleging improper compensation in relation to security screening time. A similar suit was brought in September by a group of workers in a Tennessee fulfillment center. Plaintiffs in that case where offered a settlement that reimbursed them for the time that they lost during the frisks.
In other recent Amazon news, the company recently won a $600 million contract over IBM to store information for the Central intelligence Agency.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAlabama Man Arrested After Causing Bitcoin Price to Surge, Then Plummet After Fake SEC Tweet
3 minute readHunter Biden Sues Fox, Ex-Chief Legal Officer Over Mock Trial Series
Judge Sides With McDonald's In Attorney-Client Privilege Dispute With Former Executives
4 minute readMarriott's $52M Data Breach Settlement Points to Emerging Trend
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2A&O Shearman Adopts 3-Level Lockstep Pay Model Amid Shift to All-Equity Partnership
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 5A RICO Surge Is Underway: Here's How the Allstate Push Might Play Out
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250