J.P. Morgan closing in on agreement with DOJ over mortgage probes
Reports indicate that the DOJ has strong evidence of misconduct and intends to use it in a separate criminal investigation.
October 21, 2013 at 06:45 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
For the better part of the last month, J.P. Morgan Chase and Co. has been in discussion with the Department of Justice (DOJ) to settle civil investigations into the mortgage-backed securities it sold in the run-up to the financial meltdown. Now an agreement seems to have emerged between the banking giant and the DOJ, with a final figure of $13 billion in fines and settlements on the table. If accurate, this will be the largest settlement of its type in history.
Word of the deal comes as the DOJ threatens to file a civil case if both parties cannot come to an agreement by Oct. 23.
Despite J.P. Morgan's attempts to close the investigations without admitting any wrongdoing, the settlement will only close civil investigations. Reports indicate that the DOJ has strong evidence of misconduct and intends to use it in a separate criminal investigation. The DOJ threatened to file the civil case if both parties cannot come to an agreement by Oct. 23.
The Wall Street Journal is reporting that the deal includes $4 billion to settle claims by the Federal Housing Finance Agency, another $4 billion in consumer relief and $5 billion in penalties paid by the bank. Those close to the negotiations say that the bank and the DOJ are still having issues agreeing on certain details, including whether the bank will need to release a statement as an admission of guilt.
The DOJ is using a hardline against J.P. as it's the first of many legal battles it's intending to fight with those involved with the financial crisis. J.P. Morgan's reputation was bruised during the “London Whale” scandal and continues to face tough questions from government agencies intent on holding those responsible for the financial crisis responsible.
J.P. Morgan has already paid billions in legal fines this year and blamed the amount of legal activity it conducted this past year as a major reason for its net loss in the third quarter of 2013. Reports say the bank has begun to set aside reserve funds in an effort to give itself a buffer for additional legal costs.
For the better part of the last month,
Word of the deal comes as the DOJ threatens to file a civil case if both parties cannot come to an agreement by Oct. 23.
Despite J.P. Morgan's attempts to close the investigations without admitting any wrongdoing, the settlement will only close civil investigations. Reports indicate that the DOJ has strong evidence of misconduct and intends to use it in a separate criminal investigation. The DOJ threatened to file the civil case if both parties cannot come to an agreement by Oct. 23.
The Wall Street Journal is reporting that the deal includes $4 billion to settle claims by the Federal Housing Finance Agency, another $4 billion in consumer relief and $5 billion in penalties paid by the bank. Those close to the negotiations say that the bank and the DOJ are still having issues agreeing on certain details, including whether the bank will need to release a statement as an admission of guilt.
The DOJ is using a hardline against J.P. as it's the first of many legal battles it's intending to fight with those involved with the financial crisis. J.P. Morgan's reputation was bruised during the “London Whale” scandal and continues to face tough questions from government agencies intent on holding those responsible for the financial crisis responsible.
J.P. Morgan has already paid billions in legal fines this year and blamed the amount of legal activity it conducted this past year as a major reason for its net loss in the third quarter of 2013. Reports say the bank has begun to set aside reserve funds in an effort to give itself a buffer for additional legal costs.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCoinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute readBaker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
Trending Stories
- 1'True Leadership Is About Putting Others First': 2024 In-House Award Winners Inspired, Took Road Less Traveled
- 2A Q&A with Sidley Austin's London Leader
- 3New York-Based Harris Beach Combines With Connecticut-Based Murtha Cullina, Forming NE Powerhouse
- 4New Year, New Am Law 100: Challenges Await These Newly Merged Law Firms
- 5Thursday Newspaper
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250