Midsize law firms take a bigger piece of big-ticket litigation
Over the past three years, midsize law firms with 201 to 500 lawyers have nearly doubled their share of big-ticket litigation.
October 22, 2013 at 07:02 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
As more organizations look to cut costs when it comes to litigation, smaller firms are starting to get a bigger piece of lucrative corporate work as general counsel become savvier shoppers, according to a new study.
In fact, over the past three years, midsize law firms with 201 to 500 lawyers have nearly doubled their share of big-ticket litigation. The figure has risen to 41 percent from 22 percent of the work that generates more than $1 million in legal bills, based on the results of a new LexisNexis CounselLink report, “Enterprise Legal Management Trends.”
One of the key trends driving this shift is the percentage of legal work a client provides to its top 10 law firms – 57 percent of companies surveyed have 10 or fewer firms accounting for at least 80 percent of outside legal fees. Another factor driving this trend is the frequency in which so-called large-enough firms offer alternative fee arrangements (AFAs) to their clients relative to the frequency with which the largest 50 offer AFAs.
Across the U.S., the average partner-billing rate was $381 per hour for the 12 months ending June 30, 2013 – up 2.7 percent from the previous year. The practice area with the highest hourly partner rate is mergers and acquisitions, which bills at an average of $630 per hour.
The equation is usually “the larger the firm the higher the cost,” Don H. Liu, general counsel for Xerox Corp., told The Wall Street Journal. Liu reportedly uses marquee law firms for critical transactions, but keeps the company's legal bills down by sending other work to smaller law firms in low-cost locations.
“Big law firms don't have a monopoly on talent,” he said.
Among the 15 largest U.S. cities, Philadelphia, Detroit, San Francisco, Atlanta and New York are the five cities where law firm hourly billing rates increased above 2.5 percent in both year-over-year and three-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR). Lagging behind are Phoenix, Boston, Houston, Dallas and Minneapolis.
In recent years, legal departments and law firms have slowly become more creative in finding non-hourly arrangements for more complex work to help their clients manage and predict legal expenses while still providing a comfortable level of profitability for law firms, according to Kris Satkunas, director of Strategic Consulting at LexisNexis CounselLink. Click here to read more on analyzing big data for the details on AFAs.
As more organizations look to cut costs when it comes to litigation, smaller firms are starting to get a bigger piece of lucrative corporate work as general counsel become savvier shoppers, according to a new study.
In fact, over the past three years, midsize law firms with 201 to 500 lawyers have nearly doubled their share of big-ticket litigation. The figure has risen to 41 percent from 22 percent of the work that generates more than $1 million in legal bills, based on the results of a new
One of the key trends driving this shift is the percentage of legal work a client provides to its top 10 law firms – 57 percent of companies surveyed have 10 or fewer firms accounting for at least 80 percent of outside legal fees. Another factor driving this trend is the frequency in which so-called large-enough firms offer alternative fee arrangements (AFAs) to their clients relative to the frequency with which the largest 50 offer AFAs.
Across the U.S., the average partner-billing rate was $381 per hour for the 12 months ending June 30, 2013 – up 2.7 percent from the previous year. The practice area with the highest hourly partner rate is mergers and acquisitions, which bills at an average of $630 per hour.
The equation is usually “the larger the firm the higher the cost,” Don H. Liu, general counsel for Xerox Corp., told The Wall Street Journal. Liu reportedly uses marquee law firms for critical transactions, but keeps the company's legal bills down by sending other work to smaller law firms in low-cost locations.
“Big law firms don't have a monopoly on talent,” he said.
Among the 15 largest U.S. cities, Philadelphia, Detroit, San Francisco, Atlanta and
In recent years, legal departments and law firms have slowly become more creative in finding non-hourly arrangements for more complex work to help their clients manage and predict legal expenses while still providing a comfortable level of profitability for law firms, according to Kris Satkunas, director of Strategic Consulting at
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Utterly Bewildering': GCs Struggle to Grasp Scattershot Nature of Law Firm Rate Hikes
GCs Jettisoning Zero-Based Budgeting in Quest to Be Nimble, More Efficient
3 minute readFoley & Lardner Litigator Joins Brewers Roster as Legal Chief
Mary O'Carroll on Her Move to Goodwin: Law Firms Are at the Heart of Industry Disruption
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 3BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 4GlaxoSmithKline Settles Most Zantac Lawsuits for $2.2B
- 5A&O Shearman Adopts 3-Level Lockstep Pay Model Amid Shift to All-Equity Partnership
Who Got The Work
Blank Rome partner Andrew T. Hambelton has stepped in to defend Fragrancenet.com in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed Aug. 29 in New York Southern District Court by the Blakely Law Group, targets the defendants for allegedly selling counterfeit fragrance products. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Lorna G. Schofield, is 1:24-cv-06521, Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Co. v. Quester (US) Enterprises, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Davis Polk & Wardwell partners Mari Grace and Edmund Polubinski III have entered appearances for Australia-based Bitcoin-mining company Iris Energy and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Eastern District Court by the Rosen Law Firm, contends that the defendants concealed the inadequacy of the company's site in Childress County, Texas, including it being 'ill-equipped' and unable to operate the company's proprietary design. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Peggy Kuo, is 1:24-cv-07046, Williams-Israel v. Iris Energy Limited et al.
Who Got The Work
Ryan S. Stippich of Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren has entered an appearance for biopharmaceutical company Veru Inc. and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Sept. 30 in Wisconsin Western District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of June Ovadias, accuses the defendant of failing to disclose that small sample sizes and other issues rendered it unlikely that the FDA would grant Emergency Use Authorization for the cancer drug candidate sabizabulin as a potential treatment for COVID-19. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge William M. Conley, is 3:24-cv-00676, Ovadias, June v. Steiner, Mitchell et al.
Who Got The Work
Holland & Knight partners Cynthia A. Gierhart and Thomas Willcox Brooke have entered appearances for Pakistani American Political Action Committee and Rao Kamran Ali in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The action, filed Sept. 24 in District of Columbia District Court by Jackson Walker on behalf of Pakistani American Public Affairs Committee, accuses the defendants of using a mark that's confusingly similar to the plaintiff's 'Pak-Pac' marks without authorization. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Randolph D. Moss, is 1:24-cv-02727, Pakistani American Public Affairs Committee v. Pakistani American Political Action Committee et al.
Who Got The Work
Lauren M. Rosenberg and Yonatan Even of Cravath, Swaine & Moore have stepped in to represent Israel-based Oddity Tech Ltd. in a pending securities class action. The case, filed Aug. 30 in New York Southern District Court by Pomerantz LLP and Holzer & Holzer, contends that the defendant made materially misleading statements regarding the capability of Oddity's AI technology and ongoing civil litigation, resulting in the artifical inflation of the market price of Oddity's securities. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Margaret M. Garnett, is 1:24-cv-06571, Hoare v. Oddity Tech Ltd. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250