Countrywide found liable for selling defective loans
Score one for the government in the first mortgage crisis case to actually reach trial.
October 24, 2013 at 07:52 AM
7 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Score one for the government in the fight to rectify the 2008 mortgage crisis. On Oct. 23, a Manhattan federal jury found Bank of America Corp.'s Countrywide unit liable for selling thousands of defective loans to mortgage-finance firms Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, thus setting off the financial crisis.
The case, which was the first brought by the government to actually go to trial concerning the mortgage crisis, will see civil penalties set at a later date. Assistant U.S. Attorney Pierre Armand asked the court to fine Countrywide $848 million, the gross losses between Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as a result of the fraud. Bank of America has already been hit hard from settlements concerning the mortgage crisis, with Federal Housing Finance Agency rumored to be seeking $6 billion from the bank to cover damages.
The court also found former Countrywide executive Rebecca Mairone liable for having a direct hand in defrauding the government. Mairone was the only individual defendant named in the government's suit, and according to trial testimony, the government claimed Mairone ignored potential safety concerns related to Countrywide's automated loan program named “Hustle”. Mairone, meanwhile, claimed that Hustle would increase overall loan quality by limiting the people processing loans, making the loan process more efficient.
In actuality, the Hustle program systematically removed quality controls and, through the heavy use of automated loans, resulted in a higher default rate. The government alleged that Countrywide made $165 million from the Hustle program, while Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac suffered net losses of $131 million.
According to Bloomberg, the U.S. attorney's office feels that Countrywide treated quality control “as a joke.” Manhattan U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara said in a statement, “In a rush to feed at the trough of easy mortgage money on the eve of the financial crisis, Bank of America purchased Countrywide, thinking it had gobbled up a cash cow. That profit, however, was built on fraud, as the jury unanimously found.”
A spokesman for Bank of America said the company is exploring its options to appeal. Mairone's lawyers plan to appeal as well, with lawyer Marc Mukasey saying after court, “We are not going to stop fighting for Rebecca. She's a woman of integrity, ethics and honesty. She never engaged in any fraud because there was no fraud. We're going to fight on.”
Check out these related stories from InsideCounsel:
Score one for the government in the fight to rectify the 2008 mortgage crisis. On Oct. 23, a Manhattan federal jury found
The case, which was the first brought by the government to actually go to trial concerning the mortgage crisis, will see civil penalties set at a later date. Assistant U.S. Attorney Pierre Armand asked the court to fine Countrywide $848 million, the gross losses between
The court also found former Countrywide executive Rebecca Mairone liable for having a direct hand in defrauding the government. Mairone was the only individual defendant named in the government's suit, and according to trial testimony, the government claimed Mairone ignored potential safety concerns related to Countrywide's automated loan program named “Hustle”. Mairone, meanwhile, claimed that Hustle would increase overall loan quality by limiting the people processing loans, making the loan process more efficient.
In actuality, the Hustle program systematically removed quality controls and, through the heavy use of automated loans, resulted in a higher default rate. The government alleged that Countrywide made $165 million from the Hustle program, while
According to Bloomberg, the U.S. attorney's office feels that Countrywide treated quality control “as a joke.” Manhattan U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara said in a statement, “In a rush to feed at the trough of easy mortgage money on the eve of the financial crisis,
A spokesman for
Check out these related stories from InsideCounsel:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe FTC's Rebecca Slaughter Wants Fair Competition, and a Good Night's Sleep
New Merger-Review Process Could Doom Some Deals, Add Headaches, Subjectivity to Others
7 minute readFormer CFTC Chair and SEC Commissioner Chart Election's Impact on Crypto and Capital Markets
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4Greenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
- 5Data-Driven Legal Strategies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250