Deputy director of the USPTO discusses an ‘interesting year’ at AIPLA
Rea addressed an enthusiastic lunchtime crowd of IP attorneys, declaring that they were blessed or cursed to live in interesting times.
October 30, 2013 at 06:17 AM
8 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Teresa Stanek Rea, deputy under secretary of commerce for intellectual property and deputy director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), was once the president of the American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA), so she was the perfect speaker for the AIPLA's recent conference in Washington, D.C.
Rea addressed an enthusiastic lunchtime crowd of IP attorneys, declaring that they were blessed – or cursed – to live in interesting times. Her speech highlighted the historic events that had impacted the agency in the past 18 months, indicating that the USPTO has had both challenges and triumphs, including sequestration, government shutdown, the America Invents Act (AIA) and more.
She highlighted the fact that intellectual property is one of the few policy areas where broad agreement can be forged across party lines. While there are fierce policy debates, she said, they are not along party lines but rather ideological and business-model lines. Rea does see a risk of paralysis in these debates and stated that the key to progress is flexibility, stating that a firm belief is admirable, but not if it leads to an inflexible negotiating position.
During the past 18 months, the USPTO has worked to enact the AIA and is now seeing it come to fruition. She cautioned that the work is never done when it comes to IP policy reform, citing concepts like creative destruction, Moore's law and disruptive innovation as trends that shape the marketplace.
We are, Rea stated, living in both disruptive and innovative times, and intellectual property drives these forces. IP law requires fine-tuning to ensure that protection is realized. Patent assertion entities (PAEs), software-driven innovation and copyright law changes have changed the landscape considerably.
The USPTO has taken the lead in implementing the executive actions set down by President Obama on June 4. These actions focus primarily on PAEs, and the USPTO recently published a green paper on copyright law and innovation, setting up issues concerning copyright in the Internet world.
Rea turned to specific events, discussing sequestration, stating that, as a fee-funded agency, the USPTO pared back spending without damaging its core mission. During the recent government shutdown, the organization had no access to the fees that were paid in this fiscal year, but, with a reasoned approach to spending, it stayed open and kept on-mission.
To highlight the good news coming out of the USPTO, Rea cited some promising statistics. The organization continued to reduce the backlog of unexamined patent applications, hitting an 18 percent decline in the backlog since 2009, despite a 7 percent growth in filings. First-action and total pendency are down as well. Requests for continuing action skyrocketed from 2011 to February of this year, but the USPTO has reduced the backlog by 30 percent in the past seven months.
Looking forward, Rea stated that the USPTO will be focusing on improving enforcement and implementing the executive actions outlined by President Obama, all with the intent of creating higher quality patents. To do so, the organization will:
1) Require applicants and owners to update their information regularly;
2) Implement better patent examiner training;
3) Empower citizens using patented technology in consumer products; and
4) Increase stakeholder outreach.
Other topics that will be relevant in the near future are reforms to the real party and interest information that patent owners must file, potential expansion of the covered business method process, fee shifting and the concern over PAEs moving downstream.
It sounds like the interesting times are just beginning. In the meantime, read more IP stories here:
USPTO director talks challenges and change at AIPLA conference
Justification for post-grant procedures continues to mount
IP: Unintended consequences when licensing patented technology
IP: Implications of GAO Report on patent infringement litigation
Teresa Stanek Rea, deputy under secretary of commerce for intellectual property and deputy director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), was once the president of the American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA), so she was the perfect speaker for the AIPLA's recent conference in Washington, D.C.
Rea addressed an enthusiastic lunchtime crowd of IP attorneys, declaring that they were blessed – or cursed – to live in interesting times. Her speech highlighted the historic events that had impacted the agency in the past 18 months, indicating that the USPTO has had both challenges and triumphs, including sequestration, government shutdown, the America Invents Act (AIA) and more.
She highlighted the fact that intellectual property is one of the few policy areas where broad agreement can be forged across party lines. While there are fierce policy debates, she said, they are not along party lines but rather ideological and business-model lines. Rea does see a risk of paralysis in these debates and stated that the key to progress is flexibility, stating that a firm belief is admirable, but not if it leads to an inflexible negotiating position.
During the past 18 months, the USPTO has worked to enact the AIA and is now seeing it come to fruition. She cautioned that the work is never done when it comes to IP policy reform, citing concepts like creative destruction, Moore's law and disruptive innovation as trends that shape the marketplace.
We are, Rea stated, living in both disruptive and innovative times, and intellectual property drives these forces. IP law requires fine-tuning to ensure that protection is realized. Patent assertion entities (PAEs), software-driven innovation and copyright law changes have changed the landscape considerably.
The USPTO has taken the lead in implementing the executive actions set down by President Obama on June 4. These actions focus primarily on PAEs, and the USPTO recently published a green paper on copyright law and innovation, setting up issues concerning copyright in the Internet world.
Rea turned to specific events, discussing sequestration, stating that, as a fee-funded agency, the USPTO pared back spending without damaging its core mission. During the recent government shutdown, the organization had no access to the fees that were paid in this fiscal year, but, with a reasoned approach to spending, it stayed open and kept on-mission.
To highlight the good news coming out of the USPTO, Rea cited some promising statistics. The organization continued to reduce the backlog of unexamined patent applications, hitting an 18 percent decline in the backlog since 2009, despite a 7 percent growth in filings. First-action and total pendency are down as well. Requests for continuing action skyrocketed from 2011 to February of this year, but the USPTO has reduced the backlog by 30 percent in the past seven months.
Looking forward, Rea stated that the USPTO will be focusing on improving enforcement and implementing the executive actions outlined by President Obama, all with the intent of creating higher quality patents. To do so, the organization will:
1) Require applicants and owners to update their information regularly;
2) Implement better patent examiner training;
3) Empower citizens using patented technology in consumer products; and
4) Increase stakeholder outreach.
Other topics that will be relevant in the near future are reforms to the real party and interest information that patent owners must file, potential expansion of the covered business method process, fee shifting and the concern over PAEs moving downstream.
It sounds like the interesting times are just beginning. In the meantime, read more IP stories here:
USPTO director talks challenges and change at AIPLA conference
Justification for post-grant procedures continues to mount
IP: Unintended consequences when licensing patented technology
IP: Implications of GAO Report on patent infringement litigation
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'A Warning Shot to Board Rooms': DOJ Decision to Fight $14B Tech Merger May Be Bad Omen for Industry
Exits Leave American Airlines, SiriusXM, Spotify Searching for New Legal Chiefs
2 minute read'Incredibly Complicated'? Antitrust Litigators Identify Pros and Cons of Proposed One Agency Act
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250