USPTO director talks challenges and change at AIPLA conference
The America Invents Act (AIA) certainly seemed like the end of a journey, but now, less than two years after its passage, the government is back talking about patent reform.
October 30, 2013 at 05:00 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Sometimes, when we take a long journey, we realize that what we perceive to be the end of our path is really the beginning of a new path. And, according to Dana Collaruli, director of the Office of Government Affairs at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), this is exactly where the IP space finds itself right now.
The America Invents Act (AIA) certainly seemed like the end of a journey, but now, less than two years after its passage, the government is back talking about patent reform. Collaruli believes that, after 10 years of near exhaustion, there is still a lot to discuss, as nearly all of the sections of the AIA that dealt with litigation fell out in the legislative process.
Todd Dickinson, executive director of the American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA), was on hand to interview Collaruli during the morning plenary session of the AIPLA conference. Dickinson asked Collaruli about the current administration's seeming fixation on patent assertion entities (PAEs). Collaruli agreed that there has been a lot of fervor around so-called “patent trolls” and abuse of litigation. The issue, he said, was the undefinable nature of the term “troll.” He believes that the legislative discussion on this topic has matured and that the discussion now revolves around the expense of resolving rights, which by its nature devalues those rights. Collaruli explained that the USPTO and other expert agencies are channeling the discussion from Capitol Hill and listening to new voices on the subject, such as app developers and the retail industry.
The topic then turned to the latest bill proposed by Rep. Bob Goodlatte. Collaruli stated that he has seen drafts of the bill and given comments. He believes it attempts to address four of the seven issues that President Obama mentioned in his June 4, 2013, speech on the topic. Collaruli feels that it is a good start to the conversation and that it should receive bipartisan support.
Collaruli served to kick off an event that was filled with information, discussion and thought leadership by attorneys, scholars and government officials. Check back for more news from the AIPLA conference all week!
In the meantime, check out more IP related stories:
Lex Machina uses big data, legal analytics tools to help IP attorneys
Justification for post-grant procedures continues to mount
IP: Unintended consequences when licensing patented technology
IP: Implications of GAO Report on patent infringement litigation
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'A Warning Shot to Board Rooms': DOJ Decision to Fight $14B Tech Merger May Be Bad Omen for Industry
Exits Leave American Airlines, SiriusXM, Spotify Searching for New Legal Chiefs
2 minute read'Incredibly Complicated'? Antitrust Litigators Identify Pros and Cons of Proposed One Agency Act
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250