Are haunted houses liable for personal injury?
Oddly enough, this area of law is still wholly unclear. Thats because, in simple terms, nobodys ever really tried.
October 31, 2013 at 07:27 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
To your left is a bloody skeleton. To your right is a gnome whose eyes light up. Straight ahead is darkness. You knew haunted houses are supposed to be scary, but this is a bit much. You want to leave, so you turn around to go the way you came. But, when you finally start to see the light, a vampire jumps into the path in front of you! You fall to the ground, clutching your chest. It's a heart attack.
So tell me: Is the haunted house liable for your medical bills?
Oddly enough, according to the Law Blog at the New York Times, this area of law is still wholly unclear. That's because, in simple terms, nobody's ever really tried.
“They all come of their own free will,” Stephen Hummel of America Haunts told the Law Blog. “And they want to be scared, so complaining wouldn't make sense.”
On its website, America Haunts estimates that there are more than 1,200 haunted attractions that charge admission during the Halloween season each year, while an additional more than 300 amusement facilities (theme parks and the like) that have Halloween-specific attractions. When added to the smaller, free or temporary haunted houses springing up across the country over the past week, it's almost shocking that none of them have ever been embroiled in some sort of major litigation.
According to insurance lawyer Randy J. Maniloff with White and Williams LLP in Philadelphia, who spoke with the Law Blog, the only cases he could find regarding haunted house litigation were all from the Louisiana Court of Appeal. And in each of those cases, the court ruled in favor of the haunted house.
That doesn't mean, however, that haunted houses are completely free of potential litigation. While scaring people is the name of the game, haunted houses (especially temporary ones) still need to adhere to safety codes and make sure all employees are following established laws while at the haunted house.
Want some more of the weird and strange? Check out some of the oddest recent lawsuits that InsideCounsel has found:
6 of the strangest lawsuits making headlines
5 of the strangest lawsuits making headlines
6 of the strangest lawsuits making headlines
To your left is a bloody skeleton. To your right is a gnome whose eyes light up. Straight ahead is darkness. You knew haunted houses are supposed to be scary, but this is a bit much. You want to leave, so you turn around to go the way you came. But, when you finally start to see the light, a vampire jumps into the path in front of you! You fall to the ground, clutching your chest. It's a heart attack.
So tell me: Is the haunted house liable for your medical bills?
Oddly enough, according to the Law Blog at the
“They all come of their own free will,” Stephen Hummel of America Haunts told the Law Blog. “And they want to be scared, so complaining wouldn't make sense.”
On its website, America Haunts estimates that there are more than 1,200 haunted attractions that charge admission during the Halloween season each year, while an additional more than 300 amusement facilities (theme parks and the like) that have Halloween-specific attractions. When added to the smaller, free or temporary haunted houses springing up across the country over the past week, it's almost shocking that none of them have ever been embroiled in some sort of major litigation.
According to insurance lawyer Randy J. Maniloff with
That doesn't mean, however, that haunted houses are completely free of potential litigation. While scaring people is the name of the game, haunted houses (especially temporary ones) still need to adhere to safety codes and make sure all employees are following established laws while at the haunted house.
Want some more of the weird and strange? Check out some of the oddest recent lawsuits that InsideCounsel has found:
6 of the strangest lawsuits making headlines
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250