N.Y. court set to decide on BofA $8.5 billion settlement
Will Bank of Americas $8.5 billion settlement with a group of investors that lost billions in the financial crisis stand? Thats for a New York court to decide in a case to watch.
November 18, 2013 at 06:15 AM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Will Bank of America's $8.5 billion settlement with a group of investors, including BlackRock Inc. and Pacific Investment Management Co., that lost billions in the financial crisis stand? That's for a New York court to decide on Nov. 18 in the investor group's ongoing fight with AIG.
Bank of America reached the agreement with the investor group in June 2011 in order to resolve liabilities tied to faulty mortgages that have driven the company's legal and regulatory losses up to $5.1 billion already. Lawyers for the investor group are to appear in New York state court on Nov. 18 to argue for the settlement's validity.
However, not all believe the settlement should stand. According to Bloomberg, American International Group Inc. (AIG) said that the deal is for “pennies on the dollar,” while investor losses reached as much as $100 billion as a result of failed mortgage-backed securities.
“This settlement — which resulted from a process that reeks of collusion and is infected with countless disabling conflicts — could not become the hallmark of conduct for which future trustees strive, but rather the beacon for what should be avoided,” opponents said in a court filing.
The investor group, however, believes that dissenters are shooting for money that they ultimately will not be granted. “The objectors offer a pretend world: one in which there is an ostensibly perfect, riskless and larger result to be had through litigation,” the investors said in a court filing.
Isaac Gradman, an attorney at Perry, Johnson, Anderson, Miller & Moskowitz, told Bloomberg that there is no clear indication of what will be the court's final ruling. “This one is really tough to call because it's so unprecedented, it's so broad in scope and it has such a major impact,” said Gradman. “Ultimately it comes down to her gut feeling whether the deal is reasonable and constructed in a reasonable way.”
Bank of America has seen its fair share of legal troubles lately. Check them out with us:
Will
However, not all believe the settlement should stand. According to Bloomberg,
“This settlement — which resulted from a process that reeks of collusion and is infected with countless disabling conflicts — could not become the hallmark of conduct for which future trustees strive, but rather the beacon for what should be avoided,” opponents said in a court filing.
The investor group, however, believes that dissenters are shooting for money that they ultimately will not be granted. “The objectors offer a pretend world: one in which there is an ostensibly perfect, riskless and larger result to be had through litigation,” the investors said in a court filing.
Isaac Gradman, an attorney at
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readOld Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
Lawsuit Against Amazon Could Reshape E-Commerce Landscape
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250