JPMorgan Chase finalizes deal with DOJ
The deal will resolve federal and state civil claims that were the result of the packaging, marketing, sale and issuance of residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) by JPMorgan, Bear Stearns and Washington Mutual prior to Jan. 1, 2009, says the DOJ announcement.
November 20, 2013 at 06:17 AM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
After months of tense negotiations, on Nov. 19, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that it has accepted a settlement with JPMorgan Chase that will close a number of investigations into the shaky mortgages the bank sold at the onset of the financial crisis. The $13 billion dollar figure is the largest amount that any corporation has ever paid to the federal government.
The deal will resolve federal and state civil claims that were the result of “the packaging, marketing, sale and issuance of residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) by JPMorgan, Bear Stearns and Washington Mutual prior to Jan. 1, 2009,” says the DOJ announcement.
In addition to the payout, JPMorgan has agreed to acknowledge that it misrepresented facts to the public surrounding RMBS. The admission of guilt was something that JPMorgan fought against during settlement talks.
$9 billion of the settlement will close claims from state and federal regulators. $2 billion of that will go to pay fines under the Financial Institutions Reform Recovery and Enforcement Act, and another $1.4 billion to settle claims by the National Credit Union Administration. Additional sums will also settle probes by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Federal Housing Finance Agency, as well as state regulators in New York, Illinois, Delaware and California.
The remaining $4 billion of the settlement will go to relief for consumers affected by the actions of JPMorgan, Bear Stearns and Washington Mutual. More than half of the settlement will be tax deductible for the bank.
“Abuses in the mortgage-backed securities industry helped turn a crisis in the housing market into an international financial crisis,” said U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of California Benjamin Wagner. “The impacts were staggering. JPMorgan sold securities knowing that many of the loans backing those certificates were toxic. Credit unions, banks and other investor victims across the country, including many in the Eastern District of California, continue to struggle with losses they suffered as a result.”
While this deal will end investigations for many civil cases, the mega bank still faces a number of criminal charges, which this settlement will not rectify. JPMorgan devoted a considerable amount of money to legal woes in 2013, and with this settlement the $23 billion buffer it squirreled away earlier this year for legal actions had just about evaporated.
For more background on the JPMorgan settlement, check out InsideCounsel's coverage:
JPMorgan cuts deal with investors over mortgage-backed securities
JPMorgan settles with Commodity Future Trading Commission in new “London Whale” deal
J.P. Morgan closing in on agreement with DOJ over mortgage probes
After months of tense negotiations, on Nov. 19, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that it has accepted a settlement with
The deal will resolve federal and state civil claims that were the result of “the packaging, marketing, sale and issuance of residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) by JPMorgan, Bear Stearns and Washington Mutual prior to Jan. 1, 2009,” says the DOJ announcement.
In addition to the payout, JPMorgan has agreed to acknowledge that it misrepresented facts to the public surrounding RMBS. The admission of guilt was something that JPMorgan fought against during settlement talks.
$9 billion of the settlement will close claims from state and federal regulators. $2 billion of that will go to pay fines under the Financial Institutions Reform Recovery and Enforcement Act, and another $1.4 billion to settle claims by the National Credit Union Administration. Additional sums will also settle probes by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Federal Housing Finance Agency, as well as state regulators in
The remaining $4 billion of the settlement will go to relief for consumers affected by the actions of JPMorgan, Bear Stearns and Washington Mutual. More than half of the settlement will be tax deductible for the bank.
“Abuses in the mortgage-backed securities industry helped turn a crisis in the housing market into an international financial crisis,” said U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of California Benjamin Wagner. “The impacts were staggering. JPMorgan sold securities knowing that many of the loans backing those certificates were toxic. Credit unions, banks and other investor victims across the country, including many in the Eastern District of California, continue to struggle with losses they suffered as a result.”
While this deal will end investigations for many civil cases, the mega bank still faces a number of criminal charges, which this settlement will not rectify. JPMorgan devoted a considerable amount of money to legal woes in 2013, and with this settlement the $23 billion buffer it squirreled away earlier this year for legal actions had just about evaporated.
For more background on the JPMorgan settlement, check out InsideCounsel's coverage:
JPMorgan cuts deal with investors over mortgage-backed securities
JPMorgan settles with Commodity Future Trading Commission in new “London Whale” deal
J.P. Morgan closing in on agreement with DOJ over mortgage probes
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Recent Controversial Decision and Insurance Law May Mitigate Exposure for Companies Subject to False Claims Act Lawsuits Recent Controversial Decision and Insurance Law May Mitigate Exposure for Companies Subject to False Claims Act Lawsuits](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/fd/84/3d7fb4d146d38b97cfab7af5b7c7/inside-feature-767x633-2.jpg)
Recent Controversial Decision and Insurance Law May Mitigate Exposure for Companies Subject to False Claims Act Lawsuits
7 minute read![Varsity Brands Lures Aboard Keurig Dr. Pepper Legal Chief Varsity Brands Lures Aboard Keurig Dr. Pepper Legal Chief](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/83/dc/a59e06ad42be872191fe7a086901/cheerleaders-767x633.jpg)
![Hasbro Faces Shareholder Ire Over 'Excessive' Toy, Game Inventory Hasbro Faces Shareholder Ire Over 'Excessive' Toy, Game Inventory](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/68/d7/ef03ff8a4ced831763f57095d82f/hasbro-767x633.jpg)
![CLOs Face Mounting Pressure as Risks Mushroom and Job Duties Expand CLOs Face Mounting Pressure as Risks Mushroom and Job Duties Expand](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/corpcounsel/contrib/content/uploads/sites/390/2023/10/Businessman-juggling-business-icons-767x633.jpg)
Trending Stories
- 1Jury Awards $3M in Shooting at Nightclub
- 2How Clean Is the Clean Slate Act?
- 3Florida Bar Sues Miami Attorney for Frivolous Lawsuits
- 4Donald Trump Serves Only De Facto and Not De Jure: A Status That Voids His Acts Usurping the Power of Congress or the Courts
- 5Georgia Hacker Pleads Guilty in SEC X Account Scam That Moved Markets
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250