Why diversity in the boardroom is good for business
One expert contends that diverse boards offer a depth and breadth of insight, perspective and experience to CEOs that non-diverse boards simply cannot.
November 21, 2013 at 05:42 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Diversity in the boardroom goes far beyond filling quotas or creating a board that just looks good to the public — diverse boardroom composition is also good for business. This is the contention of many executive coaches and recruiters.
The best boards are often the most diverse boards, contends Mike Myatt, who recently wrote in Forbes that “they can offer a depth and breadth of insight, perspective and experience to CEOs that non-diverse boards simply cannot.”
In a recent conversation with Patricia Lenkov, founder and CEO of Agility Executive Search, Myatt recounts the top 10 reasons why Lenkov says diversity in the boardroom is good for business, which are as follows:
- It reflects the real world — something every company should be sensitive to.
- Healthy debate can lead to better decisions.
- Divergent backgrounds mean tackling the same idea in differing ways.
- Great ideas come from disruption of the status quo.
- Your clients and customers are diverse.
- This can make your company knowledgeable and sensitive to a wider variety of groups.
- Counsel from a variety of authorities is sensible.
- Setting an example at the top will hopefully have a trickle-down effect within the organization.
- Improved reputation and brand.
- A variety of backgrounds can make the company more adaptable to its ever-changing environment.
In addition to board diversity, another critical area in the boardroom is the dynamics between general counsel and the C-suite. Directors and general counsel in the Fortune 500, respectively, take a decisively different approach to managing corporate governance issues — and their perspectives and priorities often vary when it comes to the importance of mission-critical business areas.
To get an inside look at boardroom and GC dynamics, and how these two factions can work more collaboratively for the betterment of their respective businesses and careers, InsideCounsel spoke with several Fortune 500 board members and executives.
For more stories about the boardroom, check out InsideCounsel's coverage below:
Diversity in the boardroom goes far beyond filling quotas or creating a board that just looks good to the public — diverse boardroom composition is also good for business. This is the contention of many executive coaches and recruiters.
The best boards are often the most diverse boards, contends Mike Myatt, who recently wrote in Forbes that “they can offer a depth and breadth of insight, perspective and experience to CEOs that non-diverse boards simply cannot.”
In a recent conversation with Patricia Lenkov, founder and CEO of Agility Executive Search, Myatt recounts the top 10 reasons why Lenkov says diversity in the boardroom is good for business, which are as follows:
- It reflects the real world — something every company should be sensitive to.
- Healthy debate can lead to better decisions.
- Divergent backgrounds mean tackling the same idea in differing ways.
- Great ideas come from disruption of the status quo.
- Your clients and customers are diverse.
- This can make your company knowledgeable and sensitive to a wider variety of groups.
- Counsel from a variety of authorities is sensible.
- Setting an example at the top will hopefully have a trickle-down effect within the organization.
- Improved reputation and brand.
- A variety of backgrounds can make the company more adaptable to its ever-changing environment.
In addition to board diversity, another critical area in the boardroom is the dynamics between general counsel and the C-suite. Directors and general counsel in the Fortune 500, respectively, take a decisively different approach to managing corporate governance issues — and their perspectives and priorities often vary when it comes to the importance of mission-critical business areas.
To get an inside look at boardroom and GC dynamics, and how these two factions can work more collaboratively for the betterment of their respective businesses and careers, InsideCounsel spoke with several Fortune 500 board members and executives.
For more stories about the boardroom, check out InsideCounsel's coverage below:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBeyond the Title: Developing a Personal Brand as General Counsel
Step 1 for Successful Negotiators: Believe in Yourself
Deluge of Trump-Leery Government Lawyers Join Job Market, Setting Up Free-for-All for Law Firm, In-House Openings
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1As 'Red Hot' 2024 for Legal Industry Comes to Close, Leaders Reflect and Share Expectations for Next Year
- 2Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 3Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 4Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 5Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250