Qualcomm CEO says NSA surveillance affecting business in China
Have anti-NSA feelings also extended abroad? According to one major technology CEO, the spy scandal has affected business abroad as well.
November 26, 2013 at 05:52 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Sure, the fallout from the NSA surveillance scandal has impacted American consumers' impressions of major technology companies. But have those negative feelings also extended abroad? According to one major technology CEO, the spy scandal has affected business abroad as well as on the homefront.
Qualcomm Inc. CEO Paul Jacobs recently told The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) that the NSA fallout has clearly impacted the company's business in China. While Jacobs did not explicitly say that the scandal has impacted business, he did say the company is seeing increased scrutiny from foreign business partners.
“We are definitely seeing increased pressure,” Jacobs told the WSJ. “All U.S. tech companies are seeing pressure.” He also added that in dealing with foreign business associates, “[You] have to be very cautious,” he said. “We are always very careful with whatever steps we take. How we sell. How we interact.”
Many CEOs from technology companies have spoken out against the NSA spy scandal, with Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg recently saying that the U.S. government “blew it” with its surveillance tactics. Meanwhile, Google GC David Drummond said, “We have long been concerned about the possibility of this kind of snooping, which is why we have continued to extend encryption across more and more Google services and links.”
According to Jacobs, this public perception has led to a “very delicate balancing act that goes on” when conducting dealings abroad. “There's no question there is an impact.”
But this isn't a fight that Jacobs believes he can lose. China is important to Qualcomm's business model; the company generated $1 billion in revenue from the growing market during the fiscal year that ended Sept. 29. And despite the NSA spying and some IP troubles in the U.S., Jacobs believes that the company is still on solid footing in the Asian country. He said Qualcomm “can gain significant share of the China market” and expects to see continued growth.
“Hopefully in short, medium and long term that things will move forward with the way that they have and with the market really driving things,” he said.
For more on the impact of U.S. government surveillance, check out these InsideCounsel stories:
Sure, the fallout from the NSA surveillance scandal has impacted American consumers' impressions of major technology companies. But have those negative feelings also extended abroad? According to one major technology CEO, the spy scandal has affected business abroad as well as on the homefront.
“We are definitely seeing increased pressure,” Jacobs told the WSJ. “All U.S. tech companies are seeing pressure.” He also added that in dealing with foreign business associates, “[You] have to be very cautious,” he said. “We are always very careful with whatever steps we take. How we sell. How we interact.”
Many CEOs from technology companies have spoken out against the NSA spy scandal, with Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg recently saying that the U.S. government “blew it” with its surveillance tactics. Meanwhile,
According to Jacobs, this public perception has led to a “very delicate balancing act that goes on” when conducting dealings abroad. “There's no question there is an impact.”
But this isn't a fight that Jacobs believes he can lose. China is important to Qualcomm's business model; the company generated $1 billion in revenue from the growing market during the fiscal year that ended Sept. 29. And despite the NSA spying and some IP troubles in the U.S., Jacobs believes that the company is still on solid footing in the Asian country. He said Qualcomm “can gain significant share of the China market” and expects to see continued growth.
“Hopefully in short, medium and long term that things will move forward with the way that they have and with the market really driving things,” he said.
For more on the impact of U.S. government surveillance, check out these InsideCounsel stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhat to Know About the New 'Overlapping Directorship' Antitrust Development
4 minute readThe Met Hires GC of Elite University as Next Legal Chief
Tesla, Musk Appeal Chancery Compensation Case to Delaware Supreme Court
2 minute readTurning Over Legal Tedium to AI Requires Lots of Unglamorous Work on Front End
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Here's What Corporate Litigators Expect Del. Courts to Address in 2025
- 2U.S. Supreme Court Has No Jurisdiction Over Trump's New York Criminal Case: Prosecutors
- 3The Law Firm Disrupted: With KPMG's Proposed Entry, Arizona's Liberalized Legal Market is Getting Interesting
- 4Womble Bond Dickinson Adds New Leaders as Merger Is Completed
- 5Family's Disability Discrimination Suit Cleared to Go Forward Against Six Flags
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250