Emergency responders: Cell phone tracking not precise enough
Better tracking technology will make it easier to locate and respond to incidents. However, carriers say that the technology currently available should be sufficient to find the cellphone making a call.
December 02, 2013 at 05:10 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
For a population increasingly concerned about personal information being collected and transmitted, the idea of cellphone location tracking seems like another reason to bemoan the nanny state. But while many may not like it, the ability to track cellphone locations more precisely could save lives.
Emergency responders say that better tracking technology would make it easier to locate and respond to incidents. However, carriers say that the technology currently available should be sufficient to find the cellphone making a call.
Though the proliferation of cellphones has allowed people to report emergencies more quickly and frequently, the lack of solid location tracking technology in cellphones can make it more difficult to find the person making the call. The swing in the cellular direction has caused many response teams to ask first where the caller is rather than the nature of the emergency.
According to the Wall Street Journal, around 38 percent of households no longer use landlines, preferring cellphones as the communication method of choice. This switch is more pronounced in certain areas; in California, for example, 75 percent of the emergency calls made in the last 18-months were made on cellphones.
While older cellphones were less accurate in providing a location, they were able to transmit that information immediately. New cellphones, on the other hand, can give dispatchers a better idea of location but transmit the info in two stages: first showing which cell tower is being used to relay the call, and then updating with GPS information. This can take up to 30 seconds, and does not work as well when transmitting information from indoors.
With the so called “Snowden-effect” still in full force, and a public wary about where their information goes, it's unknown whether more precise cellphone tracking systems will be appalled or applauded by consumers. Emergency teams say that regardless of public opinion; it will save lives.
Check out these additional InsideCounsel stories on privacy:
For a population increasingly concerned about personal information being collected and transmitted, the idea of cellphone location tracking seems like another reason to bemoan the nanny state. But while many may not like it, the ability to track cellphone locations more precisely could save lives.
Emergency responders say that better tracking technology would make it easier to locate and respond to incidents. However, carriers say that the technology currently available should be sufficient to find the cellphone making a call.
Though the proliferation of cellphones has allowed people to report emergencies more quickly and frequently, the lack of solid location tracking technology in cellphones can make it more difficult to find the person making the call. The swing in the cellular direction has caused many response teams to ask first where the caller is rather than the nature of the emergency.
According to the Wall Street Journal, around 38 percent of households no longer use landlines, preferring cellphones as the communication method of choice. This switch is more pronounced in certain areas; in California, for example, 75 percent of the emergency calls made in the last 18-months were made on cellphones.
While older cellphones were less accurate in providing a location, they were able to transmit that information immediately. New cellphones, on the other hand, can give dispatchers a better idea of location but transmit the info in two stages: first showing which cell tower is being used to relay the call, and then updating with GPS information. This can take up to 30 seconds, and does not work as well when transmitting information from indoors.
With the so called “Snowden-effect” still in full force, and a public wary about where their information goes, it's unknown whether more precise cellphone tracking systems will be appalled or applauded by consumers. Emergency teams say that regardless of public opinion; it will save lives.
Check out these additional InsideCounsel stories on privacy:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCoinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute readBaker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
Trending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250