European Commission fines six companies for Libor manipulation
Is there a major bank that didn't manipulate the London interbank offered rate (Libor)? Deutsche Bank and RBS are among those now fined for manipulation.
December 05, 2013 at 07:04 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Is there a major bank that didn't manipulate the London interbank offered rate (Libor)? First to be hit was Barclays in June 2012 with a $450 million settlement, and then UBS AG was forced to pay $1.5 billion in December 2012.
This time, the European Commission has multiple targets. The Commission announced on Dec. 4 that six different companies would be charged a total of 1.7 billion euros ($2.3 billion) for rigging interest rates associated with Libor, the single-highest cartel penalty leveled by the Commission. Deutsche Bank AG received the largest single penalty at 725 million euros ($985 million), while Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc received a fine of 391 million euros ($531 million).
In a statement, Joaquín Almunia, the Commission vice president in charge of competition policy, said that he was surprised not that the manipulation occurred, but rather the cooperation between banks to make it work.
“What is shocking about the LIBOR and EURIBOR (Euro Interbank Offered Rate) scandals is not only the manipulation of benchmarks, which is being tackled by financial regulators worldwide, but also the collusion between banks who are supposed to be competing with each other,” Almunia said.
Almunia added that “healthy competition and transparency” are necessary to a fully functioning economy, and he hopes the large fines will send a message that this type of collusion will be treated harshly moving forward.
The charges stem from allegations that the banks manipulated Libor for mutually shared greater profits, often using chat rooms and other outside sources to work together in manipulation. One trader told Bloomberg that he regularly asked “four or five banks in general” to set high or low fixings for a given rate. Another said that he had “a vested interest in making sure our fixings match.”
Other than Barclays and UBS, additional firms have also been implicated in the Libor scandal, even in the United States. Brokerage firm ICAP must pay $90 million for its part in the scandal, while a criminal investigation into several firm employees is still pending.
And the Commission may not be done yet. Four companies withdrew from settlement negotiations — JPMorgan Chase, HSBC Holdings and Credit Agricole withdrew from the Euribor settlement while ICAP withdrew from further Libor settlements. According to the Commission, all four continue to face an antitrust probe.
For more on the ongoing Libor manipulation stories, check out these InsideCounsel stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCoinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute readBaker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
Trending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250