Bank of America reaches $500 million settlement with investors
Previous rulings had removed the possibility for the class to reclaim investments from Countrywide, and Bank of America had indicated recently that it may still put the Countrywide division into bankruptcy.
December 10, 2013 at 06:59 AM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Bank of America has received final approval on a $500 million dollar settlement with investors claiming they were solid junk mortgage-backed securities in the run up to the financial crisis. The settlement was reached by the unit within the bank responsible for overseeing the investments taken on with its purchase of Countrywide mortgage lenders.
“An immediate cash payout that avoids the risks and expenses associated with bankruptcy, protracted litigation, appellate review, and several legal challenges militates in favor of final approval,” said U.S. District Judge Mariana Pfaelzer in her ruling on Dec. 9. She tentatively approved the deal earlier, reports Bloomberg.
The deal is good news for investors. Pfaelzer's previous rulings had removed the possibility for the class to reclaim investments from Countrywide, and Bank of America had indicated recently that it may still put the Countrywide division in to bankruptcy.
The deal settles concerns from investors that Countrywide gave misleading documents and testimonies to investors about the quality of mortgage-backed securities prior to being purchased by BoA. Many of the securities that were sold during this time were evaluated much higher than they should have been, and were eventually cut to junk status during the housing collapse causing considerable losses for investors.
Another deal pending for $8.5 billion dollars in the State of New York would settle additional issues that Countrywide had with securities there. In that case, Countrywide is charged with neglecting its contractual obligations to replace delinquent mortgages that were grouped together for securities. The $500 million settlement is not part of that deal.
BoA is also expected to pay considerable fines to the federal government over these defective loans, and has recently been pointed to as a “what-not-to-do” example of compliance when Deputy Attorney General James Cole spoke out against it and other banks at a conference at Washington D.C. on Nov. 19
For more on banking settlements check out InsideCounsel's ongoing coverage:
“An immediate cash payout that avoids the risks and expenses associated with bankruptcy, protracted litigation, appellate review, and several legal challenges militates in favor of final approval,” said U.S. District Judge Mariana Pfaelzer in her ruling on Dec. 9. She tentatively approved the deal earlier, reports Bloomberg.
The deal is good news for investors. Pfaelzer's previous rulings had removed the possibility for the class to reclaim investments from Countrywide, and
The deal settles concerns from investors that Countrywide gave misleading documents and testimonies to investors about the quality of mortgage-backed securities prior to being purchased by BoA. Many of the securities that were sold during this time were evaluated much higher than they should have been, and were eventually cut to junk status during the housing collapse causing considerable losses for investors.
Another deal pending for $8.5 billion dollars in the State of
BoA is also expected to pay considerable fines to the federal government over these defective loans, and has recently been pointed to as a “what-not-to-do” example of compliance when Deputy Attorney General James Cole spoke out against it and other banks at a conference at Washington D.C. on Nov. 19
For more on banking settlements check out InsideCounsel's ongoing coverage:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCoinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute readBaker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
Trending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250