iPhone supplier Foxconn misses labor targets
Foxconn Technology Group has not complied with Chinese labor law by allowing factory workers to exceed limits on hours even as the company met most conditions set out by a monitoring group.
December 13, 2013 at 06:48 AM
9 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Technology giant Apple has been under fire in recent years for its labor practices in facilities around the world. In early 2012, The New York Times published a Pulitzer Prize winning series of reports that exposed poor working conditions in factories that made Apple products.
The reports focused on iPad manufacturing in China, describing harsh labor conditions, safety concerns and difficult work environments. Living conditions, overtime demands and other egregious workplace red flags, like underage workers and falsified records, were documented as well. The report did a lot to bruise the reputation of Apple. The tech giant is now taking steps to improve its track record.
It had been reported recently that Apple supplier Foxconn Technology Group has not complied with Chinese labor law by allowing factory workers to exceed limits on hours even as the company met 99 percent of conditions set out by a monitoring group. After inspecting assembly lines for 15 months after releasing its final audit in March 2012, the Fair Labor Association observed that restrictions on overtime were broken because labor shortages and employee turnover forced staff to work longer hours.
After a spate of suicides in 2011, last year Apple joined the FLA, leading to inspections at three of Foxconn's factories in a bid to improve conditions and identify remedial items. Founder Terry Gou raised salaries, hired counselors and increased social activities for the company's one million workers.
“Because of Foxconn's weight in the labor market, anything they do tends to have a market-setting aspect to it,” Auret van Heerden, president of the Washington-based labor group, said in a statement. “The government's limit of 49 hours a week was always a very ambitious goal. They made phenomenal progress in getting to an average of about 52, 53 hours a week.”
During the first audit last year, the FLA found 50 breaches of Chinese regulations and the code of conduct. At the time, Taipei-based Foxconn failed to meet work-hour limits, had inconsistent health and safety policies, and issued unfair overtime pay. In its final report last month, Foxconn was found to comply with 356 of 360 action items, or about 99 percent, with the four remaining issues related to work hours.
“The results of that report demonstrate substantial overall progress by our company in carrying out the 15-month remedial program in many areas,” Foxconn said in a statement. “We recognize that there is more to be done, and that we must continue to sustain this progress.”
Apple CEO Tim Cook has made improving conditions and says the company will suspend business with those that violate its code of conduct. While all workers building iPads and iMacs at the company's Longhua plant in Shenzhen worked less than 60 hours a week, about 68 percent exceeded the monthly cap of 36 overtime hours. At the Guanlan facility in Shenzhen, where Foxconn assembles iPhones, one third of workers surpassed the 60-hour weekly limit as Apple prepared to release new products. Overall, more than half exceeded the monthly overtime mandate.
According to Apple, working hours have come down because of its attention to the issue, and the company will continue providing monthly reports on compliance. “We are proud of the progress we have made together with the FLA and Foxconn,” Apple said in an e-mailed statement. “We are committed to reducing excessive overtime even further.”
Apple states on its website, “Workers everywhere should have the right to safe and ethical working conditions. They should also have access to educational opportunities to improve their lives. Through a continual cycle of inspections, improvement plans, and verification, we work with our suppliers to make sure they comply with our Code of Conduct and live up to these ideals.”
The recommended remedies include closer monitoring of work hours on a weekly basis, revising policies and procedures, and better forecasting and production planning.
For more on compliance, check out the following stories:
JPMorgan to double compliance budget in 2014
Compliance: Examining tenant liability for pre-existing contamination
German company to pay fine in FCPA bribery case
Technology giant Apple has been under fire in recent years for its labor practices in facilities around the world. In early 2012, The
The reports focused on iPad manufacturing in China, describing harsh labor conditions, safety concerns and difficult work environments. Living conditions, overtime demands and other egregious workplace red flags, like underage workers and falsified records, were documented as well. The report did a lot to bruise the reputation of
It had been reported recently that
After a spate of suicides in 2011, last year
“Because of Foxconn's weight in the labor market, anything they do tends to have a market-setting aspect to it,” Auret van Heerden, president of the Washington-based labor group, said in a statement. “The government's limit of 49 hours a week was always a very ambitious goal. They made phenomenal progress in getting to an average of about 52, 53 hours a week.”
During the first audit last year, the FLA found 50 breaches of Chinese regulations and the code of conduct. At the time, Taipei-based Foxconn failed to meet work-hour limits, had inconsistent health and safety policies, and issued unfair overtime pay. In its final report last month, Foxconn was found to comply with 356 of 360 action items, or about 99 percent, with the four remaining issues related to work hours.
“The results of that report demonstrate substantial overall progress by our company in carrying out the 15-month remedial program in many areas,” Foxconn said in a statement. “We recognize that there is more to be done, and that we must continue to sustain this progress.”
According to
The recommended remedies include closer monitoring of work hours on a weekly basis, revising policies and procedures, and better forecasting and production planning.
For more on compliance, check out the following stories:
JPMorgan to double compliance budget in 2014
Compliance: Examining tenant liability for pre-existing contamination
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCrypto Industry Eyes Legislation to Clarify Regulatory Framework
SEC Official Hints at More Restraint With Industry Bars, Less With Wells Meetings
4 minute readTrump Fires EEOC Commissioners, Kneecapping Democrat-Controlled Civil Rights Agency
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250