RBS agrees to pay $100 million for sanction violations
There were roughly 3,500 transactions, valued at $523 million. That did not meet the disclosure requirements of the sanctions.
December 13, 2013 at 05:57 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Royal Bank of Scotland Group has agreed to pay $100 million to New York State and Federal regulators for reputedly failing to adhere to sanction programs between 2002 and 2011. The settlement will close probes pending from the New York Department of Financial Services, The U.S. Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control and the Federal Reserve.
The probes began following allegations that RBS failed to provide information about transactions from parties in Iran, Sudan, Burma and Cuba. There were roughly 3,500 transactions, valued at $523 million. That did not meet the disclosure requirements of the sanctions.
Other banks that have run afoul of sanction laws in recent months, with Bloomberg reporting that Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc., HSBC Holdings Plc (HSBA), Standard Chartered Plc (STAN) and ING Bank NV have also recently settled probes into their failure to report transactional details on dealing with sanctioned nations.
The moves are not surprising, given the United States' aggressive policing of international banking and business practices. This has not only been the case for sanction enforcement but also for the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which attempts to ensure that major institutions do not offer kickbacks to foreign nationals for business favors.
Benjamin M. Lawsky, Superintendent of Financial Service at the New York Department of Financial Services, said in a statement, “Our continued objective is to create higher standards for ethics and accountability at large banks. That will not happen overnight, but through a sustained effort – including strong enforcement of our anti-money laundering laws – we will work toward that critical goal.”
In response to the settlement, RBS is said to have dispatched a number of employees involved with the transactions. The bank also released a statement saying that it “deeply regrets” the lapse in judgment, and that it will put considerable efforts into its compliance measures to prevent it from happening again.
For more on international business enforcement check out these stories from InsideCounsel:
Federal prosecutors keep close eye on overseas corruption
List of most corrupt countries updated
Financial firms face FCPA fines for foreign fraternization
Royal
The probes began following allegations that RBS failed to provide information about transactions from parties in Iran, Sudan, Burma and Cuba. There were roughly 3,500 transactions, valued at $523 million. That did not meet the disclosure requirements of the sanctions.
Other banks that have run afoul of sanction laws in recent months, with Bloomberg reporting that Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc.,
The moves are not surprising, given the United States' aggressive policing of international banking and business practices. This has not only been the case for sanction enforcement but also for the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which attempts to ensure that major institutions do not offer kickbacks to foreign nationals for business favors.
Benjamin M. Lawsky, Superintendent of Financial Service at the
In response to the settlement, RBS is said to have dispatched a number of employees involved with the transactions. The bank also released a statement saying that it “deeply regrets” the lapse in judgment, and that it will put considerable efforts into its compliance measures to prevent it from happening again.
For more on international business enforcement check out these stories from InsideCounsel:
Federal prosecutors keep close eye on overseas corruption
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCrypto Industry Eyes Legislation to Clarify Regulatory Framework
SEC Official Hints at More Restraint With Industry Bars, Less With Wells Meetings
4 minute readTrump Fires EEOC Commissioners, Kneecapping Democrat-Controlled Civil Rights Agency
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250