FTC pushes to become regulating body of cybersecurity
In recent years, the Federal Trade Commission has stepped up as an enforcement entity, holding corporations accountable when they are negligent with customer information.
December 17, 2013 at 06:23 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
With no overarching regulations or laws governing the cybersecurity practices of organizations, it can often be unclear what consumers should expect from those in possession of their data. Likewise, making sure technologies and policies adhere to the best practices of the industry can be difficult for businesses without experience in cybersecurity.
However in recent years, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has stepped up as an enforcement entity, holding corporations accountable when they are negligent with customer information. Now the FTC is hoping to become the official regulatory body for data security.
On Dec. 12, FTC Chairwoman Edith Ramirez requested legislation that would make the FTC's current practice of policing data breaches one of its official duties. The FTC cites its authority to police trade practices that are “unfair” and “deceptive” to consumers as the basis for doing this, and has said that it only fines companies that repeatedly fail to secure customer information.
“I'd like to see FTC be the enforcer,” Law360 quoted Ramirez as saying at a privacy event organized by the National Consumers League in Washington. “If you have FTC enforcement along with state concurrent jurisdiction to enforce, I think that would be an absolute benefit, and I think it's something we've continued to push for.”
But, while the FTC has been increasingly willing to fine companies that expose consumers to cyber risk, as mentioned before, there are no truly clear rules or regulations at the federal level for companies to guide their actions.
This became clear in a recent case with Wyndham Worldwide Corp., in which the Hotelier pushed back on FTC fines.
“I'm not disputing that data security is an important issue,” said Eugene Assaf, a lawyer for Wyndham said during oral arguments on the FTC suit. “My quarrel is that the FTC is actually not the agency that's supposed to be doing it.”
LabMD also recently rebuffed FTC fines.
One thing is clear, regardless of whether or not the FTC becomes that body responsible for cybersecurity oversight; standards are needed to hold businesses accountable if the commission has any hope of effecting actual change in the space.
For more on cybersecurity check out these stories:
Recent DOJ and FTC actions highlight the role of remedies in antitrust matters
Dodd-Frank compliance is a burden for small banks, experts say
European Union adoption of cybersecurity measures delayed
With no overarching regulations or laws governing the cybersecurity practices of organizations, it can often be unclear what consumers should expect from those in possession of their data. Likewise, making sure technologies and policies adhere to the best practices of the industry can be difficult for businesses without experience in cybersecurity.
However in recent years, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has stepped up as an enforcement entity, holding corporations accountable when they are negligent with customer information. Now the FTC is hoping to become the official regulatory body for data security.
On Dec. 12, FTC Chairwoman Edith Ramirez requested legislation that would make the FTC's current practice of policing data breaches one of its official duties. The FTC cites its authority to police trade practices that are “unfair” and “deceptive” to consumers as the basis for doing this, and has said that it only fines companies that repeatedly fail to secure customer information.
“I'd like to see FTC be the enforcer,” Law360 quoted Ramirez as saying at a privacy event organized by the National Consumers League in Washington. “If you have FTC enforcement along with state concurrent jurisdiction to enforce, I think that would be an absolute benefit, and I think it's something we've continued to push for.”
But, while the FTC has been increasingly willing to fine companies that expose consumers to cyber risk, as mentioned before, there are no truly clear rules or regulations at the federal level for companies to guide their actions.
This became clear in a recent case with
“I'm not disputing that data security is an important issue,” said Eugene Assaf, a lawyer for Wyndham said during oral arguments on the FTC suit. “My quarrel is that the FTC is actually not the agency that's supposed to be doing it.”
LabMD also recently rebuffed FTC fines.
One thing is clear, regardless of whether or not the FTC becomes that body responsible for cybersecurity oversight; standards are needed to hold businesses accountable if the commission has any hope of effecting actual change in the space.
For more on cybersecurity check out these stories:
Recent DOJ and FTC actions highlight the role of remedies in antitrust matters
Dodd-Frank compliance is a burden for small banks, experts say
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCrypto Industry Eyes Legislation to Clarify Regulatory Framework
SEC Official Hints at More Restraint With Industry Bars, Less With Wells Meetings
4 minute readTrump Fires EEOC Commissioners, Kneecapping Democrat-Controlled Civil Rights Agency
Trending Stories
- 1Veritext Legal Solutions Announces the Past Acquisitions of Three Alternative Dispute Resolution Firms
- 2Sarno da Costa D’Aniello Maceri LLC Announces Addition of New Office in Eatontown, NJ, and Named Partner
- 3LSU General Counsel Quits Amid Fracas Over First Amendment Rights of Law Professor
- 4An Eye on ‘De-Risking’: Chewing on Hot Topics in Litigation Funding With Jeffery Lula of GLS Capital
- 5Arguing Class Actions: With Friends Like These...
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250