Preparing for proxy season: The changing face of directors and the challenges they face
Corporate governance has taken on a much more powerful meaning, issues which are of particular importance to financial institutions.
December 17, 2013 at 07:50 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
As many public companies ready themselves for their annual shareholders' meetings for the upcoming proxy season, boards of directors are evaluating many heavy governance issues of importance to their respective firms.
In the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, corporate governance has taken on a much more powerful meaning, issues which are of particular importance to financial institutions.
Patrick McGurn, special counsel to ISS, recently discussed some of the key issues as they relate to proxy season, including the changing face of director liabilities, avoiding enforcement actions against directors, and directors and officers insurance considerations.
“Prior to 2007 and 2008, governance was merely an after thought. Banks were in a different category when it came to governance practices. Things evolved over time,” McGurn said during a webinar held by Winston & Strawn. “Today, directors are more accountable, elections are more meaningful, and there's greater independence of board chairs and rising support for pay practices.”
Additionally, there is “greater emphasis on how competent directors are at financial institutions,” McGurn said.
The 90-minute discussion, which was moderated by Christine Edwards and Jerry Loeser, focused on the questions most asked by directors. One of the key issues board face is whether to separate the roles of chairman and CEO.
“Our policy is to make sure there is a counterbalance,” McGurn said.
Also becoming of great important is the lead director position. “A key ingredient is the presence of a very strong lead director position,” McGurn added.
While some shareholders believe that directors should have strict term limits, McGurn believes that decision-making becomes more crystallized over a longer tenure.
“Judgment ages like wine, it gets better with each passing year,” he said.
As many of today's CEOs and other senior-level executives are aging into their 60s, succession planning is another area boards need to focus on in the New Year.
“It is setting things up for disaster unless boards are preparing for succession planning…. Tenure is going to be a much bigger discussion in the boardroom,” McGurn said.
The session also focused on new compensation committee advisor independence rules, an update on the various forms of litigation being brought in connection with proxy statement disclosure, CEO pay ratio disclosure rules, and the uptick in shareholder proposals on executive compensation.
Winston's third part of the series, “How Do Directors Prepare for the Worst?” will be held on Jan. 15.
As proxy battles become more commonplace in corporate America, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently deliberated whether proxy advisers have grown so powerful in corporate elections that regulators need to impose rules to make their business more transparent.
SEC Commissioner Daniel Gallagher has warned that the SEC had created a regulatory environment that has allowed investment advisers to adopt a mindset in which they “blindly vote” in line with proxy adviser recommendations, Reuters reported.
For other corporate governance stories, check out InsideCounsel's coverage below:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFatal Shooting of CEO Sets Off Scramble to Reassess Executive Security
5 minute readBen & Jerry’s Accuses Corporate Parent of ‘Silencing’ Support for Palestinian Rights
3 minute readShareholder Activists Poised to Pounce in 2025. Is Your Board Ready?
Regulatory Upheaval Is Coming. How Businesses Prepare and Respond Will Separate Winners and Losers
Trending Stories
- 1As 'Red Hot' 2024 for Legal Industry Comes to Close, Leaders Reflect and Share Expectations for Next Year
- 2Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 3Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 4Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 5Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250