Mississippi AG files lawsuit against JPMorgan alleging misconduct
According to the lawsuit, JPMorgan attempted to collect on balances that either did not exist or had already been paid in full.
December 18, 2013 at 05:43 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
JPMorgan Chase may have settled some of its financial crisis indiscretions with a $13 billion settlement, but a new Mississippi lawsuit says the company is still conducting shady dealings, this time with late-paying customers.
Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood filed a lawsuit in federal court on Dec. 18, claiming that JPMorgan committed misconduct when it sued credit card customers in order to collect funds. The lawsuit comes after an 18-month investigation by the AG's office as well as several conversations with the company.
According to the lawsuit, JPMorgan attempted to collect on balances that either did not exist or had already been paid in full. The lawsuit said the bank “knowingly and willfully made false and misleading statements” and their lawsuits filed were “uncertified and lacked evidence.”
One woman mentioned in the lawsuit claims she was “harassed” by JPMorgan, according to The Wall Street Journal, over an already-paid balance, and the bank later attempted to contact her mother and ex-husband when the woman refused to pay again.
“Consumers' paychecks were garnished and their credit damaged, making it harder for them to refinance their homes, take out a car or student loans, or even get jobs,” Hood said in a statement.
Strangely enough, the AG's office believes that JPMorgan never actually intended on litigating against these customers. Instead, the lawsuit says, the bank filed “requests for admissions” that asked the customer to acknowledge the funds due, while the bank “relied on the fact that many consumers would not have the time, knowledge or capacity to respond to its allegations.”
The lawsuit says the investigation revealed JPMorgan's ability to actually collect late funds was not much better. Allegedly, the bank and its outside law firm “routinely” violated the Service Members Civil Relief Act by stating definitively that a customer was not in the military, and thus ineligible for benefits, when it had no way of determining that information.
JPMorgan GC Stephen Cutler may have questioned big bank fines in the days after the Department of Justice financial crisis settlement, but this problem on his hands may lead to even more trouble. According to Bloomberg, California filed a similar suit in May, and 15 other states are investigating JPMorgan's credit card collection lawsuits.
For more on JPMorgan's (numerous) legal troubles, check out the InsideCounsel articles:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCoinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute readBaker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
Trending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250