Employers beware: Avoiding Affordable Care Act can lead to litigation claims
Businesses implementing or trying to avoid being covered by the ACA could wind up exposing themselves to new litigation claims under the ACA and other related federal and state laws.
December 19, 2013 at 03:40 AM
8 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Employers may be put on the naughty list this year if they aren't careful with how they manage their employees and issues related to the Affordable Care Act. Businesses implementing or trying to avoid being covered by the ACA could wind up exposing themselves to new litigation claims under the ACA and other related federal and state laws.
James Napoli of Proskauer Rose LLP spoke during a webcast titled “Litigation Risks Related to the Patient Protection and ACA” and broke down exactly what employers should look out for and how they can avoid being charged with litigation claims.
According to recent Bloomberg BNA report, Napoli reviewed potential ACA litigation risks to look out for such as claims under the ACA itself, benefits and breach of fiduciary duty claims under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, claims under federal labor and employment laws and claims under state laws.
The biggest red flags employers should be cognizant of include communications to employees and plan participants, workforce realignment to avoid the employer mandate and ACA whistleblowing. Here are some key points Napoli shared in the webcast.
How to communicate/issue notices to employees
- Determine what needs to be in the notice by statue and guidance standards.
- Decide who will be issuing the communication and use the proper voice to communicate your message.
- Highlight the issue that is being addressed so that it is clear to all employees.
- Don't over-communicate more than is necessary.
- Identify who is receiving the communication and speak directly to them.
- Note if the communication plays more than one role to eliminate confusion down the line.
ACA employer's must haves
- 50 or more full-time employees working 30 or more hours per week
- Cannot offer health coverage to at least 95 percent of employees and dependents.
- Must provide affordable coverage and prepare to pay a penalty for each full-time employee who declines coverage and receives support in the exchange.
- Discrimination claims for interference with attainment of benefits.
- Employees looking to reduce hours, or claim their employer reduced their hours, to avoid paying ACA penalties.
- Taking adverse action against employees who receive a premium tax credit or subsidy through a public marketplace.
- Cutbacks in hours that can impact a protected class of employees
Risks to watch out for
- Discrimination claims for interference with attainment of benefits.
- Employees looking to reduce hours, or claim their employer reduced their hours, to avoid paying ACA penalties.
- Taking adverse action against employees who receive a premium tax credit or subsidy through a public marketplace.
- Cutbacks in hours that can impact a protected class of employees
If you are an employer and in danger of being audited, Napoli suggests you first develop a strategy to look at what is being audited carefully as to not inadvertently raise any other issues. And most importantly, do not admit to a breach of fiduciary duty. Luckily, he added that auditors understand that employers don't have enough information on the ACA, so they are trying to assist in compliance instead of leveling penalties.
For more news on recent litigation claims check out these related articles:
Employers may be put on the naughty list this year if they aren't careful with how they manage their employees and issues related to the Affordable Care Act. Businesses implementing or trying to avoid being covered by the ACA could wind up exposing themselves to new litigation claims under the ACA and other related federal and state laws.
James Napoli of
According to recent
The biggest red flags employers should be cognizant of include communications to employees and plan participants, workforce realignment to avoid the employer mandate and ACA whistleblowing. Here are some key points Napoli shared in the webcast.
How to communicate/issue notices to employees
- Determine what needs to be in the notice by statue and guidance standards.
- Decide who will be issuing the communication and use the proper voice to communicate your message.
- Highlight the issue that is being addressed so that it is clear to all employees.
- Don't over-communicate more than is necessary.
- Identify who is receiving the communication and speak directly to them.
- Note if the communication plays more than one role to eliminate confusion down the line.
ACA employer's must haves
- 50 or more full-time employees working 30 or more hours per week
- Cannot offer health coverage to at least 95 percent of employees and dependents.
- Must provide affordable coverage and prepare to pay a penalty for each full-time employee who declines coverage and receives support in the exchange.
- Discrimination claims for interference with attainment of benefits.
- Employees looking to reduce hours, or claim their employer reduced their hours, to avoid paying ACA penalties.
- Taking adverse action against employees who receive a premium tax credit or subsidy through a public marketplace.
- Cutbacks in hours that can impact a protected class of employees
Risks to watch out for
- Discrimination claims for interference with attainment of benefits.
- Employees looking to reduce hours, or claim their employer reduced their hours, to avoid paying ACA penalties.
- Taking adverse action against employees who receive a premium tax credit or subsidy through a public marketplace.
- Cutbacks in hours that can impact a protected class of employees
If you are an employer and in danger of being audited, Napoli suggests you first develop a strategy to look at what is being audited carefully as to not inadvertently raise any other issues. And most importantly, do not admit to a breach of fiduciary duty. Luckily, he added that auditors understand that employers don't have enough information on the ACA, so they are trying to assist in compliance instead of leveling penalties.
For more news on recent litigation claims check out these related articles:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCoinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute readBaker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250