JPMorgan and Deutsche Bank join ban on multiparty chat rooms
Working in the finance industry comes with strict compliance guidelines due to the amount of currency being traded. So its doesnt come as a surprise that big banks such as JP Morgan Chase and Deutsche Bank AG are cracking down, banning their traders from using multiparty chatrooms with employees at...
December 27, 2013 at 01:00 AM
7 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Working in the finance industry comes with strict compliance guidelines due to the amount of currency being traded. So its doesn't come as a surprise that big banks such as JP Morgan Chase and Deutsche Bank AG are cracking down, banning their traders from using multiparty chatrooms with employees at other firms.
The trend of curbing external communication within competitive firms began after recent investigations into currency manipulation activity became prevalent in the industry. According to a recent Bloomberg report, investigators around the world have been scouring shared financial chat forums for evidence of wrongdoing in probes ranging from alleged manipulation of foreign-exchange markets to interest-rate rigging.
For those banks instituting a ban, employees can expect all prior and future communications to be reviewed carefully to ensure that pertinent information is staying within each firm and interest rate rigging is minimized.
UBS and Citigroup were two of the first big banks to enforce the ban and after JP Morgan and Deutsche followed suit, even the Royal Bank of Scotland Group is considering doing the same to protect its assets.
In the past, transcripts of chatroom discussions have helped identify rigging of global benchmark interest rates. The main reason behind the chat room bans is protection. Earlier this year, Germany's largest bank fired five Frankfurt- based traders for inappropriate communication with colleagues. Four of the men sued for wrongful dismissal and returned to work. The bank said last year that its own internal investigation of alleged attempts to rig rates cleared current and former management board members of wrongdoing.
Bloomberg News reported in June that currency dealers said they had been front-running client orders and attempting to rig foreign-exchange rates by colluding with counterparts and pushing through trades before and during the 60-second windows when the benchmarks are set. They would share details of orders with brokers and counterparts at banks through instant messages to align their strategies, two of the people said at the time.
More than a half-dozen finance firms have been fined about $6 billion since June 2012 for rigging benchmark interest rates.
For recent legal news in the financial industry, check out these related articles:
Working in the finance industry comes with strict compliance guidelines due to the amount of currency being traded. So its doesn't come as a surprise that big banks such as
The trend of curbing external communication within competitive firms began after recent investigations into currency manipulation activity became prevalent in the industry. According to a recent Bloomberg report, investigators around the world have been scouring shared financial chat forums for evidence of wrongdoing in probes ranging from alleged manipulation of foreign-exchange markets to interest-rate rigging.
For those banks instituting a ban, employees can expect all prior and future communications to be reviewed carefully to ensure that pertinent information is staying within each firm and interest rate rigging is minimized.
UBS and
In the past, transcripts of chatroom discussions have helped identify rigging of global benchmark interest rates. The main reason behind the chat room bans is protection. Earlier this year, Germany's largest bank fired five Frankfurt- based traders for inappropriate communication with colleagues. Four of the men sued for wrongful dismissal and returned to work. The bank said last year that its own internal investigation of alleged attempts to rig rates cleared current and former management board members of wrongdoing.
Bloomberg News reported in June that currency dealers said they had been front-running client orders and attempting to rig foreign-exchange rates by colluding with counterparts and pushing through trades before and during the 60-second windows when the benchmarks are set. They would share details of orders with brokers and counterparts at banks through instant messages to align their strategies, two of the people said at the time.
More than a half-dozen finance firms have been fined about $6 billion since June 2012 for rigging benchmark interest rates.
For recent legal news in the financial industry, check out these related articles:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCoinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute readBaker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
Trending Stories
- 1Data Breach Lawsuit Against Byte Federal Among 1,500 Targeting Companies in 2024
- 2Counterfeiters Ride Surge in Tabletop Games’ Popularity, Challenging IP Owners to Keep Up
- 3Health Care Data Breach Class Actions Saw December Surge in NY Courts
- 4Florida Supreme Court Disbars 3, Suspends 11, Reprimands 1 in Final Disciplinary Order of 2024
- 5Chief Justice Roberts Ends Year With Defense Against 'Illegitimate' Attacks on Judiciary
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250